Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How did pacquiao "drain" cotto????????????????
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Perro View PostThis is rapidly becoming true. They won't even admit/acknowledge that Cotto fought Margarito at a CW no less than a year ago.
Some of them are already accusing him of cheating with steroids on top of the catch weight. They just don't have the brain to see that Cotto went in with the wrong gameplan(Margarito) or/and see the difference between good(Cotto) and great(Pac).
Comment
-
No excuses from ether fighter.
BUT SERIOUSLY IF ITS NO BIG DEAL THEN PAC SHOULD NOT HAVE ASKED FOR IT. NO BOXER SHOULD FIGHT FOR A 147lb belt at any other weight.
IT OBVIOUSLY IS IMPORTANT TO PAC IF HE WONT FIGHT AT THE REGULAR WEIGHTS>>>>HENCE NO PAC VS COTTO 2......OH AND ONE MORE THING
Comment
-
Originally posted by ElChicano View PostYou know damn well they are waiting for Pac to have an issue with a drug test so they can count the loss as a *.
Some of them are already accusing him of cheating with steroids on top of the catch weight. They just don't have the brain to see that Cotto went in with the wrong gameplan(Margarito) or/and see the difference between good(Cotto) and great(Pac).
thats like a Pakistani defending a ********* because he has the same ethnic background....dumb as hell.
Comment
-
If a fighters peak at cutting weight is, lets say 146, meaning he has done all he could to get down to that weight, worked his azz off and can go down no further, to go and lose another pound after that while your already slim, is very very hard to do. You people have no idea. If cotto had to lose a pound from lets say 154 to 153, that is a completly different ball game then him going from 146 to 145. If you dont know that then dont talk about any weight issues please.Last edited by Lords; 09-02-2012, 04:23 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Perro View PostAnd Cotto said on 24/7 that weight is a complete non-issue.
Comment
Comment