Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Im sorry Old school fighters are not automatically the best

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Tamis! View Post
    LOL I think we're talking to Larry's son.

    But I'm sure father and son are at the same wavelength anyways, with the father trying to catch up with the kid, so it's all good.


    larry's son has better spelling

    Comment


      Baldomir would beat LaMotta.

      lollerblades

      Comment


        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        You know what's amazing? How many times have you seen an old fighter take a youngin to school only to have his age fail him? Who remembers how much trouble Evander Holyfield had with Larry Holmes? And realizing (seeing an old HW king versus a new one) that the old HW king had skills fighters could only dream of? The difference today isn't in the skill. It's in the athleticism.
        Larry's a f***ing Hopkins fan. Thinks he is a top 20 or 30 ATG. Watching that old man do what he has done should make him realize how ****** a thread like this is.

        Comment






          both look pretty damn good to me.

          Comment


            Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post


            I mean, do people know what the **** they're talking about? A champion for six of seven years. Threw over 100 punches a round and got stronger as the fight progressed. Threw EXCELLENT combinations. Heck, if that was Roy Jones throwing a triple left uppercut (like Tony did to Cotto) we'd be on our knees. Excellent body puncher. Sturdy chin. Aggressive. Could force any boxer to brawl with him. ****, he made Daniel Santos exciting. Power/cement in both fists. Underrated boxing skills. Knew how to cut off the ring. Incredible pressure-fighter. Experienced. Savvy. Average? That muther****er was downright scary in his prime.
            Hell of a post. People too often confuse speed with skill. Similarly, slow handspeed = no skill.

            Actually, this reminds me; a poster a few months ago said there was no difference at all between Margarito and Baldomir.

            Damn.

            Comment


              Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
              larry's son has better spelling
              LOL guaranteed

              Comment


                Originally posted by larryx2013 View Post
                look at my avy and sig.ima great poster.oh let me go post in the history section.that way you cant argue with me................oh and i never boxed in my damn life so there you have it im a boxing historian


                is there a welterweight or middleweight fighting right now who you'd favor over ray robinson?

                Comment


                  Classic Philippines vs America

                  Also, boxing was a lot dirtier back then- watch saddler obviously trying to use his hair to cut into elorde's cut eye and the ref not doing anything about it.

                  you could do that type of **** in the old day. Those guys are tougher in my opinion the the fighters we have right now.

                  Last edited by Paclan; 05-21-2012, 03:57 PM.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by New England View Post
                    is there a welterweight or middleweight fighting right now who you'd favor over ray robinson?
                    I can't speak for Larry but in my opinion Sergio Martinez would be the best in every era. And with that i mean he would be able to compete.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
                      No not true, he was a solid beast, it takes skills to put pressure and impose your will. And, make your opponent to fight your fight. He was good at that. He was good at cutting off the ring.

                      Was his style cute in the ring, was he flashy, was defensive orientated? No. But, offensively did he have subtle skills? Yes he did. Had a nice uppercut too and solid body puncher. Margarito was good at fighting on the inside. By no means a bum skill wise.

                      But, again is what people presume to be skills. I have read that Oscar is more skilled than Chavez. Or, that he had better defense than Chavez Sr. Which is not true. Chavez sr defense on the inside, he could roll with punches, he could slip and duck punche, he would parry punches and also fight off the backfoot if needed to. While Oscar defense was just his feet and that's it.
                      I always thought of Margarito as crowd pleasing personally, but he wasn't a technically sound boxer and just because he wasn't terrible at a few things doesn't make him "skilled" to me. It is really more a "glass is half full/empty" thing. Slickness and flair are a bit heavily emphasized nowadays when it comes to "skill" but that has more to do with the merging of athletes, celebrity and pop culture. This is like the hall of fame thing, it is all subjective. I would prefer a boxer who is multifaceted and demonstrates ability in many areas over guys who are exceptional at a couple things but downright terrible in other areas. I'm arguing this in my own head as I type, but when I think of Margarito I don't see a well rounded "skilled" boxer.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP