Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FLOYD MAYWEATHER:"I really don't have nothing against Manny Pacquiao.Nobody reach out

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
    all you my friend..all you!
    Gracias

    Comment


      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
      You gonna use that as a sig? Just asking because I'm thinking about using it
      We all should use it. Let's unify for the righteousness of the sport and to combat the rapist of history, MANNY PACQUIAO!

      Comment


        Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
        Bobby fought Kevin Kelly...he's fought an African American


        Bobby>>>> Manny
        he almost ko'd humberto soto too. someone pacroid is "ducking"

        **** being a *******, im gonna be a Bobtard.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
          he almost ko'd humberto soto too. someone pacroid is "ducking"

          **** being a *******, im gonna be a Bobtard.
          Is that for Arum or Bobby?

          Comment


            Originally posted by cortdawg25 View Post
            We all should use it. Let's unify for the righteousness of the sport and to combat the rapist of history, MANNY PACQUIAO!
            Agree, lets all use it

            Was just asking because some people don't like sharing sigs, I do though

            Comment


              floyd's and *****s' world stopped revolving at the first negotiation because that's the only instance where they feel they got the upperhand. anything beyond that did not happen.

              they have to deny the 2nd negotiations even if it makes them look like ****** because it will put floyd in a bad light.

              now floyd is saying he's not sure whether to fight again because he doesn't know what the future holds for him. how can pac try to renegotiate a fight with a guy like that?

              so what's gonna happen? they will just bring up the first negotiation everytime they get to ask about pac. it was very clear the fight did not happen in the first negotiation. so why choose to get stuck on that? if you really want the fight to happen you've got to move on and get on the negotiating table.

              and like the *****s, floyd also likes fantasy results. he keep bringing up pac's previous losses, how he beat up oscar and hatton before pac did and triangle theories like he beat jmm easily and pac had a hard time.

              in short, he wants to emphasize that he's better than pac and he can beat him even without the fight happening. and it seems like that's what he really wants. he wants the glory but he doesn't want to fight.

              Comment


                so floyd tried to imply that pac lost to morales because he couldnt juice. What a load of bull ****. pac never knew about those tests so how could he juice. a lot of excuses in this interview. Floyd has an excuse for everything.

                Comment


                  any sane person would know that floyd is the one ducking pac.

                  and he's saying theyre not reaching out for him and there is no 2nd negotiation? THAT EXCUSE AGAIN?!
                  I'm pretty sure floyd's phone rang hundreds of times to get the fight to be made, but floyd was just covering his ears pretending he didn't hear it rang.

                  The guys a genuine liar. No wonder people call him a chicken.
                  I'm starting to think the only way Mayweather-Pacquiao gets made is when Pac is past his prime (like 35 years old) and Floyd ran out of money. D:

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by fcastro1 View Post
                    so floyd tried to imply that pac lost to morales because he couldnt juice. What a load of bull ****. pac never knew about those tests so how could he juice. a lot of excuses in this interview. Floyd has an excuse for everything.
                    so does his fans

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
                      you claim a statement is "unproven" (aka not true) without any evidence that says otherwise and you compare it with the logic that pacquiao is guilty without any evidence that proves otherwise.

                      no evidence but mere accusation of greenburg lying and pacquiao cheating.

                      both are wrong.
                      Unproven is not another way of saying not true. I don't know why that is so difficult to understand.

                      You bringing up Pacquiao is essentially a straw man not worth bothering with.

                      I am not wrong, you are desperately trying to twist my words in an attempt at giving you an angle to successfully argue from.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP