FLOYD MAYWEATHER:"I really don't have nothing against Manny Pacquiao.Nobody reach out

[cortdawg25]

Hey Team Pacquiao, Just say No to Drugs!

Just say No to Catchweights!!!

[Ryannn]

Resorting to ad hominems, I expected more from you.

there is seriously something wrong with your logic that greenburg's statements are lies unless proven otherwise.

here's a b-pac pic to lighten the mood

[Ryannn]

it sucks Manny wont share his PEDS with Bobby

bobby wouldn't take them. he has a better moral character than pacroid.

just look at this face...



that's the face of an honest man

[Cash Cow]

"Giving blood doesnt make you weak, not being able to juice because you have to give blood makes you weak" --- Floyd Mayweather

[Doctor_Tenma]

"Giving blood doesnt make you weak, not being able to juice because you have to give blood makes you weak" --- Floyd Mayweather

You gonna use that as a sig? Just asking because I'm thinking about using it

[FeFist]

there is seriously something wrong with your logic that greenburg's statements are lies unless proven otherwise.

here's a b-pac pic to lighten the mood

Understand the difference between unproven and lies. My opinion on his statements are irrelevant the point is without proof they cannot be used to support an argument.

If you don't have a problem with the logic behind your right to a fair trial then you shouldn't see a problem in the logic I am displaying right now as they are pretty much the same.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

bobby wouldn't take them. he has a better moral character than pacroid.

just look at this face...



that's the face of an honest man

Bobby fought Kevin Kelly...he's fought an African American


Bobby>>>> Manny

[Cash Cow]

You gonna use that as a sig? Just asking because I'm thinking about using it

all you my friend..all you!

[Ryannn]

Understand the difference between unproven and lies. My opinion on his statements are irrelevant the point is without proof they cannot be used to support an argument.

If you don't have a problem with the logic behind your right to a fair trial then you shouldn't see a problem in the logic I am displaying right now as they are pretty much the same.

you claim a statement is "unproven" (aka not true) without any evidence that says otherwise and you compare it with the logic that pacquiao is guilty without any evidence that proves otherwise.

no evidence but mere accusation of greenburg lying and pacquiao cheating.

both are wrong.

[Cash Cow]

Bobby fought Kevin Kelly...he's fought an African American


Bobby>>>> Manny

niiiiiiceee!!