Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shane Mosley? Seriously?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #171
    Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
    Oh so you are saying Mosley can't catch Manny with a big shot?


    What is Mosley best punch again?

    What is Manny open for?


    The answer to both straight right hands.
    No... I am saying he won't win a round.

    Comment

      #172
      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
      However you want to phrase it, he was coming in with much more positive momentum than he is right now.
      He was coming off momentum for May 2009.. not May 2010.

      Comment

        #173
        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        Well if that's the case then it's all about the technical since Floyd was always superior athletically. But an idiot says something like "he beat him using superior athleticism." The **** fight were you watching?
        What does that even mean?The fight I was watching wasthe one where every time Shane went to throw a punch Floyd landed first. I assumed handspeed had something to do with that must have been all technical skill, speed is an unimportant factor on how fast you can deliver a punch. Floyd is a much better fighter than Hopkins ever was and the reason for that is that hes athletically superior. If Floyd had been the less athletically gifted fighter you feel as if the fight would have been exactly the same?

        Comment

          #174
          Originally posted by AKATheMack View Post
          What does that even mean?The fight I was watching wasthe one where every time Shane went to throw a punch Floyd landed first. I assumed handspeed had something to do with that must have been all technical skill, speed is an unimportant factor on how fast you can deliver a punch. Floyd is a much better fighter than Hopkins ever was and the reason for that is that hes athletically superior. If Floyd had been the less athletically gifted fighter you feel as if the fight would have been exactly the same?
          Yeah, that's called timing. Oh wait, Manny is faster than Marquez so I guess that can't be it Maybe you can't differentiate between the two. Being fast doesn't automatically mean you just do that - it's not as if Shane is some slow poke.

          Comment

            #175
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
            No... I am saying he won't win a round.
            If Mosley lands a shot like he did on Floyd which you just made a big deal about, he would win that round.

            That is how he won the round against Floyd one big shot followed by another then not much else~

            Comment

              #176
              Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
              Yeah, that's called timing. Oh wait, Manny is faster than Marquez so I guess that can't be it Maybe you can't differentiate between the two. Being fast doesn't automatically mean you just do that - it's not as if Shane is some slow poke.
              To be fair it isn't all one or all the other.

              The combination of his technique, timing, and athleticism, all played apart.

              Comment

                #177
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
                If Mosley lands a shot like he did on Floyd which you just made a big deal about, he would win that round.

                That is how he won the round against Floyd one big shot followed by another then not much else~
                In that hypothetical scenario, sure.





                Mosley doesn't win a round.

                Comment

                  #178
                  Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
                  To be fair it isn't all one or all the other.

                  The combination of his technique, timing, and athleticism, all played apart.
                  No, reed. Saying something like "Floyd beat Shane using superior athleticism and speed" is just about the dumbest thing I've read all day.

                  Comment

                    #179
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                    No, reed. Saying something like "Floyd beat Shane using superior athleticism and speed" is just about the dumbest thing I've read all day.
                    Yes, Dazed.


                    It was a combination of everything.

                    Not just one thing.

                    Comment

                      #180
                      Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
                      Yes, Dazed.


                      It was a combination of everything.

                      Not just one thing.
                      Yeah...everything...as in...Mayweather is simply the better boxer. Yesterday, today and probably tomorrow.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP