Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shane Mosley? Seriously?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Yeah, that's called timing. Oh wait, Manny is faster than Marquez so I guess that can't be it Maybe you can't differentiate between the two. Being fast doesn't automatically mean you just do that - it's not as if Shane is some slow poke.
    Again Roy was less technical than every fighter he ever faced and was able to do that, so enough with ridiculous comparisons.
    Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
    To be fair it isn't all one or all the other.

    The combination of his technique, timing, and athleticism, all played apart.
    Thank you.

    Comment


      Originally posted by AKATheMack View Post
      Again Roy was less technical than every fighter he ever faced and was able to do that, so enough with ridiculous comparisons.
      Less technical? Uhh...no. Unorthodox? Yes.

      Comment


        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        Yeah...everything...as in...Mayweather is simply the better boxer. Yesterday, today and probably tomorrow.
        Ok, well you were implying speed had aboslutely ZERO to do with it.

        Where in fact, it was a combination of everything... including his speed.

        Comment


          Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
          In that hypothetical scenario, sure.





          Mosley doesn't win a round.
          If you are open for a guys best shot, the probability falls on the side that they will land thus winning a couple rounds.

          It won't be that simple for Manny, unless of course he can frustrate Mosley then it is really simple.

          Comment


            Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
            Mosley won't win a round.

            Wouldn't be surprised if the ref steps in to save him.

            Now come on, Reed. You're making it seem like Mosley isn't gonna caught Manny with anything big. Mosley can time Manny the same way he caught Floyd. After all, Mosley will have an easier target in front of him.

            Comment


              Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
              Ok, well you were implying speed had aboslutely ZERO to do with it.

              Where in fact, it was a combination of everything... including his speed.
              Umm...no. Let's try and stick to the topic here. What I'm saying is that the idea that Floyd beat Mosley because of "superior athleticism and speed" is just ******.

              Comment


                Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
                If you are open for a guys best shot, the probability falls on the side that they will land thus winning a couple rounds.

                It won't be that simple for Manny, unless of course he can frustrate Mosley then it is really simple.
                150 punches to the face a round should do it.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  Less technical? Uhh...no. Unorthodox? Yes.
                  No less technical. As in he had less technique. He winged it which he was able to do based on superior athleticism.

                  Comment


                    Feb 2010: Roach: Mosley is too good a fighter.

                    November 2010[after a loss and a draw]: Roach: We'll fight Mosley in 2011.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by AKATheMack View Post
                      No less technical. As in he had less technique. He winged it which he was able to do based on superior athleticism.
                      And I disagree. LOL @ winged it. Please. Jones was a master of technique. Threw perfect hooks, perfect uppercuts, combinations. Good jab. Parried as good as any boxer today. Amazing footwork. Winged it? Yeah, ok.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP