Vitali vs Brock? It may happen

[Nautilus]

Why do you speak about things you have no idea about like they're facts?

You're just a little kid who's bitter and doesn't want to see Vitali fight anyone with a pulse.

You have NO IDEA what the extent of either Toney or Vitali's injuries are, and as I told you before, James Toney (at 36 years old, constantly out of shape and injury prone) is NOT so formidable that he needs to be avoided.

And you speak as if you are an MD?

[Bozo_no no]

And you speak as if you are an MD?

Because I said he doesn't know the extent of the injuries makes me sound like I'm a doctor?

Once again, Vitali:

1) Has had more than enough time to recover
2) Hasn't fought a credible Heavyweight in years
3) Would be willing to fight Rahman on Sept 24th if he was ready


But he can't fight James Toney?

It's a high profile fight, a big money fight, and one that's very win-able for him.

What's the problem?

[Nautilus]

Because I said he doesn't know the extent of the injuries makes me sound like I'm a doctor?

Once again, Vitali:

1) Has had more than enough time to recover
2) Hasn't fought a credible Heavyweight in years
3) Would be willing to fight Rahman on Sept 24th if he was ready


But he can't fight James Toney?

It's a high profile fight, a big money fight, and one that's very win-able for him.

What's the problem?

Solve the problem for Vitaliy, please:

1) if he fights Toney or Brewster, as Vit wanted, he likely looses WBC title to Rahman; and he will get accused of ducking rahman

2) if he waits for Rahman, the Sep28 will likely be posponed even further on Rahman's demand, which will make Vit go without a fight even longer; and he will get accused of ducking Toney or Brewster.

If you were Vit, which one of the two would you pick?

The choices aren't that great either way, especially coming of an injury (provided it is serious, of course).

[Nautilus]

Because I said he doesn't know the extent of the injuries makes me sound like I'm a doctor?

you could have asked him to elaborate

[Bozo_no no]

Solve the problem for Vitaliy, please:

1) if he fights Toney or Brewster, as Vit wanted, he likely looses WBC title to Rahman; and he will get accused of ducking rahman

2) if he waits for Rahman, the Sep28 will likely be posponed even further on Rahman's demand, which will make Vit go without a fight even longer; and he will get accused of ducking Toney or Brewster.

If you were Vit, which one of the two would you pick?

The choices aren't that great either way, especially coming of an injury (provided it is serious, of course).

You are speaking as though you know what the WBC will and won't sanction.

In the ********** interview with Shelly Finkel (Vitali's advisor) he stated he didn't think there would be a problem getting the fight sanctioned by the WBC should they move forward with the Toney fight.

Vitali is dead set on fighting in Sept, and the chances the Rahman Barrtett winner being ready are slim. So he's going to fight anyway, and I think it's pretty clear he'll be given clearence to fight without being stripped, so I think those questions you asked are moot points. If he was going to be stripped, he wouldn't even consider fighting, he'd just wait for the Rahman Barrett winner.

[Bozo_no no]

you could have asked him to elaborate

I didn't need to. He's 16, and he doesn't know what the extent of either injuries were. I've discussed this with him before, and he's dead set on seeing Vitali take a little to no risk fight in Sept.

Having a career full of little to no risk fights has made me want to see Vitali fight someone in the top 5-7 of the division. It's not like anyone of them are animals.

[Nautilus]

You are speaking as though you know what the WBC will and won't sanction. .

Certainly not. I said "likely", not "for sure".

In the ********** interview with Shelly Finkel (Vitali's advisor) he stated he didn't think there would be a problem getting the fight sanctioned by the WBC should they move forward with the Toney fight.

If so, why do you assume that Toney-VK won't happen?

Vitali is dead set on fighting in Sept, and the chances the Rahman Barrtett winner being ready are slim. So he's going to fight anyway, and I think it's pretty clear he'll be given clearence to fight without being stripped, so I think those questions you asked are moot points. If he was going to be stripped, he wouldn't even consider fighting, he'd just wait for the Rahman Barrett winner.

Please answer: what should Vitaliy do?

[Nautilus]

I didn't need to. He's 16, and he doesn't know what the extent of either injuries were.

And I am 4, am I?

Having a career full of little to no risk fights has made me want to see Vitali fight someone in the top 5-7 of the division. It's not like anyone of them are animals.

Were not Sanders and Johnson top 5 ranked by WBC before they fought VK? I do not think Williams was top 5 ranked though.

[Bozo_no no]

Were not Sanders and Johnson top 5 ranked by WBC before they fought VK? I do not think Williams was top 5 ranked though.

Johnson was a credible opponent, and it's not Vitali's fault Johnson came in at 260+, but he did, and that was sad.

I don't consider a 38 year old Corrie Sanders a very credible win. Maybe you do, and if so that's your opinion.

[Bozo_no no]

If so, why do you assume that Toney-VK won't happen?




Please answer: what should Vitaliy do?

1) Because he's looked at Oleg Maskiev as an opponent, and now Brock.

2) Fight James Toney.