Originally posted by gwildcat77
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Team Pacquiao: Floyd Mayweather Demands More Money
Collapse
-
-
Floyd retracts both offers
DAMN!! Floyd being a ***** again about another demand.. PAC met 2 big demands from FLOYD one in FEB.. the 50-50 split and LAST WEEK the 14 day-cutoff... and NOW the dude retracts BOTH offers .. damn, what's his REAL agenda...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by check hook View PostI agree.........*****s are so stoopid...money splits always come down to how many internet sites have a fighter ranked number 1
Something Frazier didn't understand in his rematch with Ali.....how ****** of Smkin Joe......he should have paid some nerds to make more internet boxing sites to rank him number 1....he could have gotten a bigger slice of the pie!!!!
Dumb *****ronic nation just doesn't get it........Floozy is CLEARLYU ducking the hero of Asia...quack quack!!!!
IMA DOG, IMA GORILLA........IMA GORILLA, IMA DOG!!!!!!!!! I TALK THE MOST ****!!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostBroham, I don't think even the biggest ***** would agrue that Pac isn't popluar. But popular isn't what matters when it comes to who's the bigger draw. 24/7 is a good tool, but it doesn't promise that a a promotion is gonna be successful. Calzage-Jones tanked. Pacquaio had 24/7 with de la Hoya nd Hatton and Mayweather outdid him 2:1 with the same opponents. Pacqauio-Cotto had 24/7, Mayweatehr-Mosley outdid it. I don't think your being realistic bro. Mayweather is just a bigger draw than Pac anyway you look at it and is in no way outta line for asking to be compensated for it a potential promotion.
The numbers remained the same prior to the last negotiation and not a whisper from the Mayweather camp. Mosley/May only slightly outsold Pac/Cotto, the numbers aren't that far apart. My general point is you can't compare Mosley/May to Pac/Clottey and that seems to be what the Mayweather camp is basing negotiations on. Mayweather was a slightly bigger draw before the last failed negotiation, judging by that very same criteria why did he accept 50/50 then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by gwildcat77 View PostWHY SHOULD FLOYD GET MORE MONEY.. the following WEBSITES still have PAC rated as No. 1 POUND 4 POUND after the FLOYD & MOSLEY fight.. boxing.about.com, proboxing-fans.com, ring ****zine, secondsout.com, ringtv.com. The other sites are not up to date but still lists PAC on top.
LEONARD will iNSIST that BOY continues to PUNK OUT!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by RL_GMA View PostC'mon man...50/50 is fair considering these are the two biggest stars in Boxing. Both are deserved of an even share and both have a big fan base.
If anything, make the stakes higher and do a 52/48 split with the winner taking 52. Keep in mind as well that both will get % off PPV and gate, so are they really gonna hold up a fight of this magnitude over greed?
Comment
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostCalz/Jones had a 24/7? I actually attended that fight live, packed house but we all knew and expected the eventual outcome. I'm sure the larger public knew this as well and didn't want to invest in what they saw as one fighter on the way to retirement versus a fight who had seen his best days years before, there was no intrigue in that fight.
The numbers remained the same prior to the last negotiation and not a whisper from the Mayweather camp. Mosley/May only slightly outsold Pac/Cotto, the numbers aren't that far apart. My general point is you can't compare Mosley/May to Pac/Clottey and that seems to be what the Mayweather camp is basing negotiations on. Mayweather was a slightly bigger draw before the last failed negotiation, judging by that very same criteria why did he accept 50/50 then?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gwildcat77 View PostDAMN!! Floyd being a ***** again about another demand.. PAC met 2 big demands from FLOYD one in FEB.. the 50-50 split and LAST WEEK the 14 day-cutoff... and NOW the dude retracts BOTH offers .. damn, what's his REAL agenda...
to PUNK OUT!!!
Comment
Comment