Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Above Pacquiao; Ring's Rankings Questionable

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by DR.ORGYY View Post
    1.pac
    2.may.............
    yes, no. 1 in your list as a *******!

    Right after the fight, Boxingscene has PBF as P4P King, then today's news showed The Ring having the same ranking. What else do you need? The May 1 fight clearly demonstrated that a future hall-of-famer can be taken to school by an extraordinary fighter in PBF!

    Comment


      Originally posted by big_james10 View Post
      This guy, Ronnie Nathanielz, is an idiot!
      Why the hell is Boxingscene keeping this guy? CLearly, Nathanielz is not following a rational logic when writing and the fact that he denies the official ranking w/in Boxingscene is reason enough to fire this guy! He has the balls to question The Ring's ranking, hasn't he checked the ranking in Boxingscene, which mirrored that of Ring's! ****in Pac nuthugger, is an idiot!

      aren't they all?

      Comment


        Ronnie stop whining and being a b--ch, aight?! why don't you go and make your own boxing site with your own rankings for Christ's sake!!! Can't believe this ****** won't retire yet!

        Comment


          i already knew who wrote the "article" when i read the title.

          Comment


            A one-dimensional fighter that gets marked up in every fight shouldn't have been no.1 anyways.

            Comment


              Pacman is P4P best but lesser than Mayweather at welterweight. People who call Ronnie an idiot needs to take up logic.

              Comment


                you are all idiots and ignorant

                why don't you just give your comments/clarifications on the main issue of: how come the winner between the no. 2 (babyfloyd) and no. 3 (oldman mosley) WW was elevated to no. 1 and the former no. 1 demoted to no. 2, instead of attacking the writer, ronnie. the obvious reason is: Because the members of the rating panels are all loyal to their boss-owner of ring ****zine, oscar, but can't just demote the pacman in their P4P rating because the boxing world will surely reject that.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                  Shane was the lineal champ after Margarito.

                  But, not The Ring champ. He was ranked #1. Rankings and championships are different. To be the champ you have to beat the champ. To be ranked #1 you don't have to beat the #1 ranked fighter..

                  After Shane beat Margarito he was inactive for 16 months. While in the mean time Pac beat two top 5 WWs. There should be no problem with Pac being RANKED #1 after Clottey. You just can't sit on your rankings.

                  However, the argument should be that Shane should of been The Ring champ after Margarito NOT ranked #1.
                  Thats the beauty of being #1. Doesnt matter if you beat #2, #3, #4 and #5.. You aint #1 until you beat #1. All these Pac Stans want to give Pac the fast track to greatness off beating a supposed "prime" clottey and "Joe Santiago's Cotto". LOL

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Kampung.Boy View Post
                    Pacman is P4P best but lesser than Mayweather at welterweight. People who call Ronnie an idiot needs to take up logic.
                    The pac who beat Marquez by one point? or the pac who lost 11 of 12 rounds to JMM? Maybe the Pac that beat a dried up DLH is the best? Or the pac who avoided all real challenges at 135 and fought the weakest champ David Diaz is the P4P best? How about the Pac that beat a Cotto at 145 and not 147? Or the Pac that made Erik fight one last time @ 130 when erik couldnt barely make the weight anymore? or how about the Pac that beat 3k Battery? Is that the P4P best pac? oh wait.. how about the Pac that doesnt want to take a drug test to prove he's clean when all other fighters who want a piece of Floyd are more than willing to take the needle?

                    Pac stans have no logic. They are notorious gamblers that LOVE Vegas. Thats why hes #1. Your peoples money from ******** and lining Bob Arums pockets is what makes him #1. Not his style or his opposition.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by spider8124 View Post
                      why don't you just give your comments/clarifications on the main issue of: how come the winner between the no. 2 (babyfloyd) and no. 3 (oldman mosley) WW was elevated to no. 1 and the former no. 1 demoted to no. 2, instead of attacking the writer, ronnie. the obvious reason is: Because the members of the rating panels are all loyal to their boss-owner of ring ****zine, oscar, but can't just demote the pacman in their P4P rating because the boxing world will surely reject that.
                      Pac man lost his spot because he didn't fight Mosley when he could've. He fought Cotto after Margarito beat him and after Mosley beat Margarito. Mosley should have fought Pac after Hatton..Period. He got a title from Cotto that meant nothing. Thank boxing politics to as why Pac is now # 2. Pac beat everybody Floyd beat, besides Cotto, but Floyd beats Mosley, who had cottos former title...get me? Pac never entered the realm for the undisputed WW title. He fought just as much for money and hype as Floyd. A spades a spade

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP