Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Above Pacquiao; Ring's Rankings Questionable

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I think some people are getting confused, Yes Cotto beat Mosley but after that he lost to Margarito who then lost to Mosley.. No way can Pac remain number 1 at WW when he didnt beat Mosley.

    Comment


      Why do they allow people that can't be OBJECTIVE post articles on this site.
      It's pathetic!

      Comment


        Originally posted by Counter Punch View Post
        Pacquiao shouldn't have been ranked ahead of Mosley in the first place!!!!
        Why not???

        Comment


          i dont see what the problem is here. Mayweather beat the #1 welterweight so he deserves to be ranked #1 at welterweight but Pacquiao retains the #1 p4p status. totally understandable.

          Comment


            Originally posted by ophqui View Post
            +1


            horrible article from the worst writer on boxingscene
            Lyle Fitzsimmons gives Ronnie a run for his money. Both suck equally.

            Comment


              Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
              Why not???
              Because he got it by beating Cotto when Cotto was ranked behind Shane.

              Comment


                Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
                Ring ****zine which prides itself on being the “Bible of Boxing?somehow appears to have bent if not broken its commandments. [Click Here To Read More]
                This is a really pathetic article, the worst, most biased article that I have ever read on boxingscene. I didn't hear Ronnie complain of bias when The Ring awarded Pac their fighter of the decade award. Why didn't he say that it was a meaningless award from a ****zine with no credibility back then???

                And bringing up The Ring's rules about how a championship vacancy is filled is just ******. The Ring's Welterweight championship is vacant, and the order of the contenders is and always has been fluid, and based solely on the fighters' most recent performances. Their rules for winning a vacant title are completely irrelevant. And Mosley was rated higher by The Ring than Cotto, when Manny fought Cotto. This rant by Ronnie is not worthy of boxingscene. Why does boxingscene allow such drivel to be published?
                Last edited by Dave Rado; 05-04-2010, 04:02 PM.

                Comment


                  beating prime clottey and prime cotto >>> beating corpse mosley and over the hill mid sectioned marquez

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                    Lyle Fitzsimmons gives Ronnie a run for his money. Both suck equally.
                    No Ronnie is even worse than Lyle. Much worse. Especially this article, which is nothing more than an idiotic rant from a deranged man suffering from eating serious quan****** of sour g****s.
                    Last edited by Dave Rado; 05-04-2010, 04:04 PM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                      Why not???
                      Overall yes Pac should have and was ranked higher than Mosley but not at WW because Mosley beat the man Margorito #1 WW who beat the man Cotto #1 WW to become the #1 WW even though they screwed up the rankings and had Pac over Mosley at WW when he wasn't supposed to be.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP