Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Pacquiao duck a suppossedly "past prime" Mosley!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #91
    Originally posted by Bogler View Post
    instead of being ******ed, why dont you create a sensible poll that asks which fighter would pac have ducked more if you were able to choose between a pac-cotto or pac-mosley fight?


    Because acting more ******ed is the way to get back at a *******..

    Comment

      #92
      Originally posted by flexxx145 View Post
      I'm just going by Pac fan standards who call Floyd a ducker. But you make some good points except Roach said in his own words that Mosley is too good. There is no taking that back.
      Ok fair enough. In all honestly I have said that if Floyd beats Shane...he gets 100% full credit from me...no excuses etc. Thats how I feel, and I can't really speak for others though.

      As far as Roach...I agree with his statement. They will fight Shane, but if they have an option that is against another top fighter, will bring in a lot more money, and will still add to Pac's legacy...it only makes sense to take it.
      Business (which is what boxing is) is all about highest reward with the lowest risks involved. Everyone does this, including Arum with Pacquiao.

      Comment

        #93
        Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
        Ok fair enough. In all honestly I have said that if Floyd beats Shane...he gets 100% full credit from me...no excuses etc. Thats how I feel, and I can't really speak for others though.

        As far as Roach...I agree with his statement. They will fight Shane, but if they have an option that is against another top fighter, will bring in a lot more money, and will still add to Pac's legacy...it only makes sense to take it.
        Business (which is what boxing is) is all about highest reward with the lowest risks involved. Everyone does this, including Arum with Pacquiao.
        How much more money do you think Cotto brought in, as opposed to what Shane would have brought in?

        Comment

          #94
          Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View Post
          How much more money do you think Cotto brought in, as opposed to what Shane would have brought in?

          Remember that Arum gets a cut on his two fighters in Cotto and Mosley.

          Comment

            #95
            Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
            Ok fair enough. In all honestly I have said that if Floyd beats Shane...he gets 100% full credit from me...no excuses etc. Thats how I feel, and I can't really speak for others though.

            As far as Roach...I agree with his statement. They will fight Shane, but if they have an option that is against another top fighter, will bring in a lot more money, and will still add to Pac's legacy...it only makes sense to take it.
            Business (which is what boxing is) is all about highest reward with the lowest risks involved. Everyone does this, including Arum with Pacquiao.
            Well that's a fair statement. Can't argue with that. But what you just said debunks the whole "ducking" argument for PBF more than Pac. May makes all of his fights based on the money.

            Comment

              #96
              Originally posted by Gutz View Post
              Because acting more ******ed is the way to get back at a *******..
              You have to speak their language. Notice I speak sensibly to unbiased guys like you and OSIRIS.

              Comment

                #97
                Originally posted by Bogler View Post
                this ******ed thread should die. if pac went after mosley, we'd be seeing more 'pac ducked cotto' threads than on mosley's. anyone who disagrees is just hatin'.
                Actually anyone that seen Cotto lose run and get a gift cause of the parade knew he was done and merely a lamb for Pacs slaughter. real talk.

                Comment

                  #98
                  The more red i get the better my day gets...giving hate is like saying your right and I hate you for it lmao...They ducked Mosley outright deal with it like Manny does...ummm ummm arum ummm ummm yeah mmm hmmm no blood, uhhh that is ummm something I dunno uhhhhhh.

                  Comment

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Gutz View Post
                    TS is ******ed


                    Pac fought the guy who beat Mosley..
                    You're ******ed for even trying to apply the triangle theory using three fighters with three different styles. The only way that works is if you have two fighters with the same style, with the third having a completely different one.

                    Comment

                      #100
                      Originally posted by The Great Shark View Post
                      You're ******ed for even trying to apply the triangle theory using three fighters with three different styles. The only way that works is if you have two fighters with the same style, with the third having a completely different one.
                      Okay..

                      If Pac fought Mosley instead.. this thread would be about how Pac ducked Cotto..

                      Arum pushed for Cotto cause they are both TR fighter and Arum makes more money..

                      Arum is scum...


                      Pac will fight anyone Arum will put in the ring with him.. It silly to get on Pac who can still fight at LW and JWW taking on the top dawgs in WW.. But to you *****s he a joke..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP