Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Imagine suing somebody for battery in a professionally sanctioned fight.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

    The carny him and his Merry band of thugs attacked had heart.
    I hope that carny sues Haney
    I agree because a pro boxers hands are potentially deadly weapons, there's that potential in law again.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

      He’s suing him for battery not cheating. That’s the point I’m making. Not defending Garcia popping whatsoever. But a professional fighter suing someone for battery in a professionally sanctioned fight is softer than baby sh**.
      What a ****** response.

      Consent is what stops the damage caused throughout a boxing fight being GBH. Haney did not consent to fighting a fighter who was taking PEDs ergo the damage caused derives from an assault.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

        Forget your ratio idea because it would not fly anywhere there is so many variables and unknowns, I really cant believe that you dont see how the amount of Ped users caught would be like 1 in a 10,000 fights maybe more , the odds are totally skewed for the point youre trying to make, its like saying 20% of fatalities in road accidents are drink drivers, well why not fine people for not being drunk because they are in the 80% bracket of fatalities .

        And the point is Haney is testing the legal waters of this, if this gets heard in court don't be at all surprised to see him win the case if Ryan cant pull a rabbit out of the bag, if it gets to court its going to change the consequences of Peds in boxing.
        Bruh.....the unknowns can work in my favor as well.
        The unknown is not proof.
        The proof we do have is, clean fighters seriously injure, or worse, other clean fighters.
        Not roiders.
        In that regard, there is no dispute.

        Haney agreed to fight the weight bully
        That was a "bigger" issue than the roids.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

          I agree because a pro boxers hands are potentially deadly weapons, there's that potential in law again.
          Potentially.....what an open ended word.
          Every driver has the potential to run people over
          Every doctor has the potential for malpractice
          Every gun owner has the potential of losing their minds
          Every situation known to man can have negative "potential"

          That carnival worker did not agree to engage with Haney AND his crew.
          It was him trying to defend himself.

          Haney agreed to fight a guy who lost on the scales.
          Now he's crying about roids being responsible for his hurt feelings

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

            Potentially.....what an open ended word.
            Every driver has the potential to run people over
            Every doctor has the potential for malpractice
            Every gun owner has the potential of losing their minds
            Every situation known to man can have negative "potential"

            That carnival worker did not agree to engage with Haney AND his crew.
            It was him trying to defend himself.

            Haney agreed to fight a guy who lost on the scales.
            Now he's crying about roids being responsible for his hurt feelings
            Yes but that is how the law operates.

            Every driver must have a licence
            Every doctor must be licenced
            Every gun owner must be licenced

            The reason is to safeguard against the potential to do harm in the form of incompetence; this is the pretence behind the license; the dog you own is under scrutiny because the breed represents the potential to bite, it's a never-ending list of public protection vs potential for harm that drives many of the laws we live by, its just the way society is.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

              Yes but that is how the law operates.

              Every driver must have a licence
              Every doctor must be licenced
              Every gun owner must be licenced

              The reason is to safeguard against the potential to do harm in the form of incompetence; this is the pretence behind the license; the dog you own is under scrutiny because the breed represents the potential to bite, it's a never-ending list of public protection vs potential for harm that drives many of the laws we live by, its just the way society is.

              Having licenses doesn't remove the potential
              I don't know what to tell you.
              You ignore the facts and rely on "potential"

              Have you even done that google search ???

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post


                Having licenses doesn't remove the potential
                I don't know what to tell you.
                You ignore the facts and rely on "potential"

                Have you even done that google search ???
                Are you looking at how the law operates, or trying to win a word game. The court case is looking like its happening which must meet legal standards to get in the door, now there is a counter claim which is also the norm in such things Im just saying why its happening , I really dont know what it is your trying to stamp.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                  Are you looking at how the law operates, or trying to win a word game. The court case is looking like its happening which must meet legal standards to get in the door, now there is a counter claim which is also the norm in such things Im just saying why its happening , I really dont know what it is your trying to stamp.
                  I'm trying to show how roids are nowhere near as dangerous as a clean fighter.
                  And I did just that.
                  I don't have to use potential, even though a clean fight has shown the potential to kill his opponent more than a roid fighter.

                  As for the law, every man has the potential to break the law.
                  What then ?
                  Haney will have a hard time proving roids were the cause for the hurt feelings and not the size discrepancy.
                  Or maybe Ryan is just the better fighter.
                  Haney and his crew couldn't hurt a carnival worker.

                  When you get the chance, do that google search.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

                    I'm trying to show how roids are nowhere near as dangerous as a clean fighter.
                    And I did just that.
                    I don't have to use potential, even though a clean fight has shown the potential to kill his opponent more than a roid fighter.

                    As for the law, every man has the potential to break the law.
                    What then ?
                    Haney will have a hard time proving roids were the cause for the hurt feelings and not the size discrepancy.
                    Or maybe Ryan is just the better fighter.
                    Haney and his crew couldn't hurt a carnival worker.

                    When you get the chance, do that google search.
                    Makes no sense, are youre saying PEDs dont enhance the fighter?

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                      Makes no sense, are youre saying PEDs dont enhance the fighter?
                      I don't have to say anything
                      The fights and the results are there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP