Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07
View Post
And swing rds don't need to be in the rules. Its simply a rd where there is dispute. One judge could prefer x, another could prefer y & in a close rd they give to different guys off of that.
Haney needs to be given every "swing" round to win, and he got outlanded in all but 3 rounds.
Rewatch it on slow motion and count landed punches and recall the "effective aggression" metric and give us your scorecard, please.
Then there's the false narrative that "to be the champ you have to beat the champ" means that you have to win clearly. That's nonsense.
I do subscribe to the concept that there are close enough fights with enough swing rds that the margin of error between either guy winning is possible without anything corrupt, biased or sketchy needing to be involved. And this fight qualifies as that for me based on what I saw, the official cards & what the overall boxrec fan scorecards are saying.
The biggest thing that smelled like a rat to me was the narratives being pushed throughout fight week, about "Loma is old; does he have one more great performance; only a handful of old fighters have won this sort of fight.". Then when Muratalla was asked who he wanted next, and said "I want the winner of the main event," Top Rank said "You think you deserve Devin Haney?" Fight hadn't even happened yet, and they were acting like Haney had won.
Comment