Are Bud - Spence fighting for p4p #2?

[Lance98]

Inoue has beaten top guys, champs through his tear of 4 divisions to go along with undisputed.
thats better than anything Spence has accomplished. And if Crawf wins that 2x undisputed and 3x lineal.

Casual, easily impressed nut hugger.

[Wamb]

Inoue is doing people like prime Roy used to. He’s playing a different sport than his opponents. Tonight’s fight is clearly for #2 p4p.

[YGriffith]

They're fighting for the undisputed WW title and all of the marbles, this is way more important than some popularity contest.

[The Big Dunn]

After the monster again proved that he is a generational talent and possibly one of the greatest fighters of any era below featherweight many are calling him the number one fighter in the world regardless of what happens on Saturday. Do you agree with this?

Spence is likely fighting for #2 while Crawford is fighting for #1.

[The Big Dunn]

The winner will be number 1 as inoue hasn't got the resume that they have. Inoue is one of the pound for pound guys, but not at the top. You fanboys got to stop with this crap.

I would disagree. The guys he fights are lower weights so I dont think many of us have a real sense of his level of comp.

Dude has fought 18 straight title fights against the top guys. His résumé deserves mor respect.

[dibzvincent143]

Bud already like number 2 now, he beats spence he easily gets number 1 p4p.

spence is also top 3-8 so if he beats number 2, he gets the number 1 p4p as well.

Inoue beat fulton, a great win, but he’s someone who’s outside the p4p rankings.

Unless it’s a controversial decision or an unimpressive win, winner of crawford-spence should get number 1.

[cork]

Belts don't mean to me what they mean to you, I look at who holds the belt and what form they were in when a guy beat them, Postal Gamboa Algeiri Peterson, the list goes on all average guys in my book, I still think Errols is a little stronger than TC because of better versions of Porter and Brook, in the big picture I don't think either guys resume compares to the last eras top guys, cleaned out don't mean much when its cleaning out rubbish.

I agree belts dont mean as much now as it did back then and I also agree there were better boxers 10-15 years ago then today.

Also agree Spence got better wins against the same opponents they faced cause when they faced them.

Where we disagree is Spence is the king in one weight and Crawford actually proves he's p4p by dominating 3 division while we can only guess Spence can.

I guess I have the same problem when people rank kov and ggg that high when they were rated at there time. Can only guess they would dominate other people against actually going out there and prove it like who I mentioned.

[cork]

I think it's as good as Inoue's.

With Crawford included it's probably better.

I think it's really inflated. He beat two legit WW and his other wins are ok.

I don't consider Danny or Mikey good wins.

[shenmue]

They're fighting for the undisputed WW title and all of the marbles, this is way more important than some popularity contest.

Yep, this p4p nonsense on this site is out of control.

[El_Mero]

Casual, easily impressed nut hugger.

B!tch@ss hater halfaf.ag. your opinion is worth sh.it