Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Haney: Most Important Fight For Me Is George Kambosos, To Become Undisputed Champion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Rodtang View Post

    For some yes. But there are still some fighters out there true to the honour and tradition of creating legacy and being the best they can be. Haney is one. Kambosos another. Josh Taylor too. What fighters earn is not our concern. A true boxing fan should want to see the best fights. And fighters shouldn't be ridiculed if they want them and can't get them. So No I won't go away. I'll keep watching the sport and continue to advocate for fighters that are genuinely trying to make the sport great again, rather than pander to social media queens who think they're special because there's more than enough idiots out there that praise them for mediocrity. Haney may still be only marginally above that mediocrity bracket, but it's not for the want of trying to make the big fights. So he indeed deserves praise for that instead of continual disrespect.


    Boy, if you don’t get cho goofy ass on somewhere with this foolishness!

    I keep giving you a chance to walk away with the little bit of dignity you have left because you’ve received aid in this discussion (by Rod Tug or whatever his name is) and you’re still stinking it up-horribly! Lol

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by MeanestNiceGuy View Post


      Boy, if you don’t get cho goofy ass on somewhere with this foolishness!

      I keep giving you a chance to walk away with the little bit of dignity you have left because you’ve received aid in this discussion (by Rod Tug or whatever his name is) and you’re still stinking it up-horribly! Lol
      I don't need to walk away. I'm correct in what I'm saying. That I can live with.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by MMegatron View Post
        All these pr1ck5 think "undisputed" means having all the belts. It doesn't. It is when you have beaten all your credible threats convincingly enough for no-one to dispute you are the best. Fuc41ng marketers.
        You pretty much nailed it on the head. Morons these days dont know **** about boxing, most of these guys still have mommy change their diapers. the fact that Haney is recognized as the WBC champ sums it up. Dude won his belt via email, never won it in the ring. Absolute fraud. Nobody is undisputed till they clear out their division of all legitimate champions. This is why boxing is dying atm, ****ing idiot casual fans need to be sent to Guantanamo bay.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by MeanestNiceGuy View Post
          Didn’t you just say Loma ducked Haney and took on Franchise status to avoid the fight? Why drop one belt to go after another one against a much tougher opponent.

          Listen, I’ve said this before and I’ll say it for the last time….money ALWAYS moves the needle…not a frickin belt. History has repeatedly proven this and it often puts you soy boys in a frenzy because the sport isn’t “following the rules” when a guy is the mandatory and blah blah blah.

          You’re riding for a guy (Haney) who had ZERO leverage at the time he became the mandatory. Trust me bro, nobody was ever threatened by Haney and if anything, he was just a young pup in the way while grown men handled business.

          We’re gonna get Lomachenko/Kambosos by late Spring. Devin’s irrelevant bro. He still doesn’t stack up against the current lightweights because he’s fighting on that ****** app and he’s not a big a draw as he believes he is. We have Loma vs Commey tomorrow…Devin won’t be thought about. Bet that.
          No, actually, I've never said that at all lol my comments were simply aimed at disproving your opinion that Haney wasn't going after Lomachenko, which is what I did.

          You've gone from 'Haney didn't really want Loma', to 'Haney didn't deserve the chance', to 'Haney doesn't bring in the money'. When you change the goalposts so often, it shows you're just hating for the sake of hating.

          Seeing as you avoided answering my question, I'll ask it again; why did Lomachenko fight López instead of Haney? If you're saying belts mean absolutely nothing, and considering a fight against López or Haney would offer minimal difference in terms of money...why did Loma pick López? I know I've pressed the issue again, but it's purely rhetorical, your answer isn't needed (I'm simply asking in order to display your illogical hypocrisy); López had the IBF belt, ​​​which is the only reason López got the fight.

          Sit down.
          Last edited by Squared.Circle; 12-10-2021, 03:56 PM.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP