Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Valero could easily have been p4p#1

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Executioner54 View Post
    Zahir Raheem beating Morales says more about how shot Morales was at the time. Raheem had lost to Rocky Juarez at 126 and lost to Acelino freitas after beating Morales. Morales was completely shot when he fought pacquiao the second time.
    Bingo!

    It's amazing how some people can get in the p4p top 3 spot for beating shot fighters, while others who beat the same fighter months before somehow fade into obscurity. That's boxing for ya!

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by strugler View Post
      No he wasnt he was winning the first couple of rounds...He was past prime most definitely......where did The raheem fight actually happen? yes it was at 135 , he beat an unfocused out of shaped Morales.........
      Strugler no offense but all you do is hang from pacquiaos nuts.

      Raheem beat Morales right before Morales fought pacquiao the second time.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Maestro USA View Post
        Bingo!

        It's amazing how some people can get in the p4p top 3 spot for beating shot fighters, while others who beat the same fighter months before somehow fade into obscurity. That's boxing for ya!


        LMAO....Who beat an unfocused overweight Morales you mean.....you sound really funny cause youre the same guy who wants the p4p based on sparring sessions........

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Maestro USA View Post
          Bingo!

          It's amazing how some people can get in the p4p top 3 spot for beating shot fighters, while others who beat the same fighter months before somehow fade into obscurity. That's boxing for ya!
          I like the way you think Maestro.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by Executioner54 View Post
            Strugler stop embarrassing yourself. Watch this interview. Fast forward to 8 minutes if you dont want to watch the whole thing.

            Haha! I forgot about that little gem. That is one of those videos that *******s like to pretend don't exist.

            Yes, "strugler" is struggling badly to come up with any type of meaningful post in this thread. It's probably best to simply ignore him, as I've done. He's trying to turn this thread into some sort of childish debate. It's a shame how there's always one poster who can completely dumb down a thread.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Executioner54;5025756[B
              ]Strugler no offense but all you do is hang from pacquiaos nuts. [/B]

              Raheem beat Morales right before Morales fought pacquiao the second time.

              No offence taken. we agree sometimes......sometimes we dont......

              Im not gonna give this Maestro guy any BOTD........Didnt you see his take on
              "SPARRING MATCHES" against actual fights you're reaching a little far to prove your take on Morales - Pac.

              Which was at lightweight? right? it was supposed to be at 130?

              Me a pacnuthugger? naaah.........im just not buying any excuse.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Maestro USA View Post
                Haha! I forgot about that little gem. That is one of those videos that *******s like to pretend don't exist.

                Yes, "strugler" is struggling badly to come up with any type of meaningful post in this thread. It's probably best to simply ignore him, as I've done. He's trying to turn this thread into some sort of childish debate. It's a shame how there's always one poster who can completely dumb down a thread.


                Nope. Mine is based on facts not speculations.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Maestro USA View Post
                  Bingo!

                  It's amazing how some people can get in the p4p top 3 spot for beating shot fighters, while others who beat the same fighter months before somehow fade into obscurity. That's boxing for ya!
                  the fighters in & around MP's weight class whom he hasn't faced are guzman, soto, valero... maybe baloyi & fana...

                  floyd's? williams, margarito, mosley, cotto & clottey...

                  who do u think has more to prove michigan guy?

                  compare the fighters whom MP has beaten & compare floyd's...

                  is beating castillo, corrales, baldomir, corley, brussels & sosa any way better than beating ledwaba, sasakul, barrera & morales & marquez?

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Executioner54 View Post
                    I like the way you think Maestro.


                    Executioner54 how could you?lol..............you're not fighting fair. I wouldnt support a PAC nuthugger even if it maked PAC look much better..........you need to do some soul searching.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Executioner54 View Post
                      Strugler stop embarrassing yourself. Watch this interview. Fast forward to 8 minutes if you dont want to watch the whole thing.

                      lol roach is funny.. "come on floyd come out of retirement we'll knock you out too" please, pacman will get beat badly

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP