Pacquiao will be remembered as a greater fighter than Mayweather

[GoldSugar]

Floyd is perfect as he dont fight tough competion regularly. He hasnt beat anyone pac hasnt thats worth mentioning about, and he also dont ko anyone, while Pac does.

FLoyd has fought frightenly little over the last 5 years when he should be cementing some kind of legacy he had established in his 20's. What he did in his 20,s wasnt that outstanding though thats the problem.

Pac fought frightenly sh|t fights over the last 5 years. Would you be happy with Floyd fighting Mosley in 2011, Marquez in 2012, Margarito after his suspension, and Tim Bradley at 147?

Floyd also hasn't been KTFO by a blown up lightweight in the last 5 years, let alone his whole career.

[Jcsuper]

I will remember Pac as the guy who was put to sleep by a cherry pick after robbing him 2 times.

[happyman]

damn this poll shows there really are boxing fans still out there

[ADP02]

Pac will be remembered as the fighter who ducked the biggest fight of his life over testing only to then want testing after getting his a$$ knocked out cold by a cherry pick gone wrong 40 year old light weight he force to move up and who was schooled 12 rounds by Floyd.

Actually its Floyd who will be remembered as the ducker. He proved it and told you Floyd fans but you wouldn't listen.

As for Manny, how can you fight your toughest rivalry 4 times against Marquez and 3 fights with Morales, twice Barrera and fights against Cotto and so forth and be called a ducker by none other than a Floyd fan! lol!

Floyd keeps on telling you that his health and money is more important. We all believe him, when will you?

[Marvellous1]

Freddie Roach also told us that Mosley was too good to face at 147lbs in 2009. Top Rank told us that more stringent testing wasn't needed and the commission should be allowed to do their jobs. Pacquiao also made it clear he couldn't fight Cotto without a catchweight AGAIN. Pacquiao said if Philipinos didn't agree he actually won his third fight against Marquez... they weren't true Philipinos.

People say ****** stuff in boxing all the time. Unless you actually agree with all the above.

[hugh grant]

Pac fought frightenly sh|t fights over the last 5 years. Would you be happy with Floyd fighting Mosley in 2011, Marquez in 2012, Margarito after his suspension, and Tim Bradley at 147?

Floyd also hasn't been KTFO by a blown up lightweight in the last 5 years, let alone his whole career.

Dont try using reverse phycology and be in denial cos anyone who knows anything about anything knows Pac has faced tough competition for years and years regularly. You compare fighters who fight regularly and are you telling me JMMs records is half as tough as Pacs? Im not even going to mention Floyd as he dont even fight.
If you fight regularly you can lose to anyone believe me. Pac hadnt been ko;ed by a lightweight until he took one fight too many. Floyd never has that one fight too many though does he the cherry picking part timer. JMM is tougher than Guerro anyway so when is FLoyd going to take a risk?

I will remember Pac as the guy who was put to sleep by a cherry pick after robbing him 2 times.

Well when Floyd fights he has proved he can lose to the castillos of this world.

[The Big Dunn]

Dont try using reverse phycology and be in denial cos anyone who knows anything about anything knows Pac has faced tough competition for years and years regularly. You compare fighters who fight regularly and are you telling me JMMs records is half as tough as Pacs? Im not even going to mention Floyd as he dont even fight.
If you fight regularly you can lose to anyone believe me. Pac hadnt been ko;ed by a lightweight until he took one fight too many. Floyd never has that one fight too many though does he the cherry picking part timer. JMM is tougher than Guerro anyway so when is FLoyd going to take a risk?




Well when Floyd fights he has proved he can lose to the castillos of this world.

you said hatton was a risk before floyd beat his ass. Then you changed your tune. Typical.

Fighting Morales twice after he lost to zahior raheem isn't that big a deal. If zahir can beat him, manny should easily be able to do the same.

[jaestix1]

damn this poll shows there really are pac-tards still out there

fixed..........

[hugh grant]

you said hatton was a risk before floyd beat his ass. Then you changed your tune. Typical.

Fighting Morales twice after he lost to zahior raheem isn't that big a deal. If zahir can beat him, manny should easily be able to do the same.

Hatton was a champ at the same time as FLoyd, so Floyd and hatton had to happen. It was a risky fight for hatton and Floyd, but hattono deserves more credit for fighting out of his country and not at his ideal weight you know.

Morales might have underestimated Zahir. But Morales is still a great fighter. Anyone who beat SRR after SRR lost to turpin wouldnt be accused of cherry picking.

[PAC-BOY]

Hatton was a champ at the same time as FLoyd, so Floyd and hatton had to happen. It was a risky fight for hatton and Floyd, but hattono deserves more credit for fighting out of his country and not at his ideal weight you know.

Morales might have underestimated Zahir. But Morales is still a great fighter. Anyone who beat SRR after SRR lost to turpin wouldnt be accused of cherry picking.

hugh...dont waste your time....this guy actually thinks Floyd didnt retire when the WW division was at its hottest! He really thinks floyd retirement was real!:WORD: