<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chuvalo and Bonavena in the 30s

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Chuvalo and Bonavena in the 30s

    If George Chuvalo and Oscar Bonavena came along in the 1930s, say turning pro in 1932-33, would they be able to cut it? Would they never be heard of or would one of them be champion?

    #2
    I believe this kind of question is complete nonsense. One can do nothing except have a gut feeling, which in the end only comes down to whether you like the guy or not.

    When one proceeds to espouse a whole bunch of crap that he thinks is insight, he is in fact just shoving his head up his own ass.

    With that said, I now proceed to do just that, shove my head up own ass:

    Both were tough enough to fight in any era, to be serious contenders, neither had the skill to be champion.

    Schmeling-Sharkey-Carnera-Baer-Barddock-Louis:

    I think we all agree neither gets by Louis, so by 1937 the door is closed.

    I really don't know Bonavena well enough, so I am going to considerate on Chuvalo. I'll leave it to another to evaluate Bonavena.

    Schmeling over Chuvalo UD (15)
    Sharkey over Chuvalo TKO (12) I think once Sharkey realizes how one dimensional Chuvalo is he will attack.
    Carnera vs. Chuvalo is a pick 'um depending who lands big first; who lands big last.
    Baer over Chuvalo TKO (8)
    Braddock over Chuvalo UD (15) Assuming it's the Braddock who fought Baer maybe even a stoppage when Chuvalo tries.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
      I believe this kind of question is complete nonsense. One can do nothing except have a gut feeling, which in the end only comes down to whether you like the guy or not.

      When one proceeds to espouse a whole bunch of crap that he thinks is insight, he is in fact just shoving his head up his own ass.

      With that said, I now proceed to do just that, shove my head up own ass:

      Both were tough enough to fight in any era, to be serious contenders, neither had the skill to be champion.

      Schmeling-Sharkey-Carnera-Baer-Barddock-Louis:

      I think we all agree neither gets by Louis, so by 1937 the door is closed.

      I really don't know Bonavena well enough, so I am going to considerate on Chuvalo. I'll leave it to another to evaluate Bonavena.

      Schmeling over Chuvalo UD (15)
      Sharkey over Chuvalo TKO (12) I think once Sharkey realizes how one dimensional Chuvalo is he will attack.
      Carnera vs. Chuvalo is a pick 'um depending who lands big first; who lands big last.
      Baer over Chuvalo TKO (8)
      Braddock over Chuvalo UD (15) Assuming it's the Braddock who fought Baer maybe even a stoppage when Chuvalo tries.
      Thank you. I had no idea how halfwitted you are.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
        Thank you. I had no idea how halfwitted you are.
        'Half-witted' is a hyphenated word.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
          'Half-witted' is a hyphenated word.
          Can one be 'witted?' One can have an amount of Wit, ergo... a half wit, a man losing his wits, etc. But assuming we were to receive the gift of "wit" would that be described as being " witted?"

          consider: "I was a half wit and one day received a second half... ergo... was I witted?

          Enquiring minds want to know...

          Comment


            #6
            Both would club the likes of Sharkey down.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
              Both would club the likes of Sharkey down.


              You only say that because you're one of the Dempsey haters.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP