I voted Pep from the list. I would have included Whitaker, Duran, Barrera, Napoles, and Robinson on your list as well.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Poll: Your Best Technical (Pure) Boxer Ever
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostI voted Pep from the list. I would have included Whitaker, Duran, Barrera, Napoles, and Robinson on your list as well.Anomalocaris likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Mitts View PostMaybe your guy is not even on my list of candidates, but there is a good chance. If he is not, please reveal him. The candidates are in no meaningful order, as in randomized. Maybe you think the list needs some changes. All right by me, but I doubt if they allow that when you can't even edit a title you screwed up on.
Pure, technical? You probably get the picture but it can be discussed further. To me there is a lot of deep schooling involved, and usually a lot of defensive genius. Some guys are so good at defense they are fun to watch. Not many, for me at least.
The default answer here for me is Ray Robinson. He did the most things flawlessly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
Just trying to figure out what makes Jim unknowable bro.
Corbett is not any more or less misrepresented by historians than any other figure from the same era is he?
Really all I'm after. If there's something Corbett specific that makes Corbett a little harder to know I'd like to know about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostI voted Pep from the list. I would have included Whitaker, Duran, Barrera, Napoles, and Robinson on your list as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
Gosh... Its kind of tough without some definition of primacy beyond "technical boxer." Someone who threw all the shots? like Tunney? A technical punching marvel with no wasted movements? (Louis), a defensive specialist? (Whitaker).
The default answer here for me is Ray Robinson. He did the most things flawlessly.
But I can't tell you what a pure boxer is to you. But one should be able to ascertain that defense has to play a hugely important role. The 'not getting hit' part of the art.
To me Robinson may have done more things right than anyone as well. But one of the things he didn't do in the film he is captured in is to avoid getting hit a lot. He got hit a lot, at least as a middleweight. He wanted to fight too much. He wanted to end fights. He got in there a lot and got hit a lot. Sure, he knew how to slip, roll, parry, take steam off, dance...but Robinson still got hit a lot in my view. He even wanted to fight a little too much against Maxim, which I always thought lost him that fight. I do not consider Robinson a great ring general. His greatest application of defense may have been his deadly offense.
Best ever P4P? Maybe so. I have him top 5 at the least. But probably not in the top 30 for defense. He liked money, butts in the seats. Robinson slugged as much or more than he boxed. Sluggers get hit. He wanted to end fights as early as possible. He loved the celebrations, as everyone knows.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr Mitts View Post
In the introductory post I mentioned deep schooling. In those 40-50 words I also mentioned defense twice including defensive genius. I told you that is what it means to me. Combining that with the list of candidates gives a pretty clear picture of what I think. The two Leonards are the only guys on there with anything like a big punch.
But I can't tell you what a pure boxer is to you. But one should be able to ascertain that defense has to play a hugely important role. The 'not getting hit' part of the art.
To me Robinson may have done more things right than anyone as well. But one of the things he didn't do in the film he is captured in is to avoid getting hit a lot. He got hit a lot, at least as a middleweight. He wanted to fight too much. He wanted to end fights. He got in there a lot and got hit a lot. Sure, he knew how to slip, roll, parry, take steam off, dance...but Robinson still got hit a lot in my view. He even wanted to fight a little too much against Maxim, which I always thought lost him that fight. I do not consider Robinson a great ring general. His greatest application of defense may have been his deadly offense.
Best ever P4P? Maybe so. I have him top 5 at the least. But probably not in the top 30 for defense. He liked money, butts in the seats. Robinson slugged as much or more than he boxed. Sluggers get hit. He wanted to end fights as early as possible. He loved the celebrations, as everyone knows.Mr Mitts likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment