Originally posted by Willie Pep 229
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jess Willard v. Jack Johnson
Collapse
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostI am not sure I agree. IMO a 1903-04 Jeffries vs. Johnson is a very different fight than their 1910 go.
I guess the best match-up would have been Jeffries staying active until 1907 and the two meeting that year.
But both men in their prime, Jeffries is too strong and hits too hard for Johnson.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostI was being facetious. I realize that comes across poorly on a message board. But saying Johnson would never beat Willard is the same as saying Jeffries could never beat Johnson. I don't think anyone could say for sure, but I have little doubt the best versions of themselves would fair much better against Johnson for Jeffries, and Willard for Johnson. And while Jeff may have struggled (win or lose) at his best with Johnson, I believe Jack would have handled Willard with much less trouble while at his best. Of course this is my opinion as there is really no way to prove it.
Johnson's greatest asset was his size and strength. That disappears against both Jeffries and Willard. Jeffries could actually stop men with with punch, and remain standing when tagged, which further handicaps Johnson in their pairing.
Again, Johnson's success was based on being the larger man and fouling. He loses those advantages against Willard. While Willard didn't have Jeffries punch, confidence or skill, he was an even bigger man. It's not a pretty fight, but it's hard to imagine Johnson fairing any better earlier in his career. Willard was fighting guys like McCarty and Smith while coming up. I'm not sure Johnson EVER fought anyone that good. Johnson's career took full flight. Willard's was cut short in Toldeo. It's clear Johnson was hell bent on being the best in the world, while Willard was a reluctant fighter. But Jess is simply too much of Jack's own medicine.
Comment
Comment