Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jess Willard v. Jack Johnson

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
    Jess Willard has a good win?
    Does Jack Johnson!?!?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Rick Taylor View Post
      willard vs marciano is a 50/50 fight tbh
      Hahahaha!

      Careful! She's out of Midol! When Marci's on the rag, look out!

      But yeah... Marciano was retired by Moore. Something tells me Willard makes that an ugly night.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
        Does Jack Johnson!?!?
        Yes, very good wins, especially when compared to ****ing Willard's nothing

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
          Yes, very good wins, especially when compared to ****ing Willard's nothing
          Funny an little skank like you can probably name ALL the boys you blew in High School, but can't name a single one of Johnson's "very good wins".

          Willard fought MUCH better competition. Smith, McCarty, Dempsey and an even more seasoned version of Moran.

          See what happens when you take just 5 minutes to research a topic before shooting off. And not once did I go off topic ranting about barroom brawlers from 300 years ago that no one cares about.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
            Funny an little skank like you can probably name ALL the boys you blew in High School, but can't name a single one of Johnson's "very good wins".

            Willard fought MUCH better competition. Smith, McCarty, Dempsey and an even more seasoned version of Moran.

            See what happens when you take just 5 minutes to research a topic before shooting off. And not once did I go off topic ranting about barroom brawlers from 300 years ago that no one cares about.
            The only win you have named is a man who had just lost to JJ and fought no one of worth between.

            Smith kicked Willard's ass

            Luther tied him and never beat anyone worth a damn.

            Dempsey walked through him

            So, um, what was Willard's good win?

            ****ing moron

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
              Hahahaha!

              Careful! She's out of Midol! When Marci's on the rag, look out!

              But yeah... Marciano was retired by Moore. Something tells me Willard makes that an ugly night.
              willard was just to big strong and hard punching for marciano.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                The only win you have named is a man who had just lost to JJ and fought no one of worth between.

                Smith kicked Willard's ass

                Luther tied him and never beat anyone worth a damn.

                Dempsey walked through him

                So, um, what was Willard's good win?

                ****ing moron
                When research, I meant actually review the details in full, not take a cursory glance and resort to your typical bluster in passing off the details you might've caught as actual understanding.

                Johnson NEVER fought anyone as good as McCarty or Smith.

                Willard didn't lose to a past-prime Middleweight while champion.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
                  When research, I meant actually review the details in full, not take a cursory glance and resort to your typical bluster in passing off the details you might've caught as actual understanding.

                  Johnson NEVER fought anyone as good as McCarty or Smith.

                  Willard didn't lose to a past-prime Middleweight while champion.
                  I already know all about the white champions.

                  Given you never make any threads or posts beyond anything but you opinion it's reasonable to assume I have far more threads and posts covering these guys already stored here at BS.

                  Luther was ass.

                  Carpentier isn't even that good let alone Luther's sad ass and the sad ass tournament of clowns he beat.

                  Anyway, Tommy Burns was a better win for Jack than Jack was for Willard given Burnsie was a decade younger when he fell to Jack than Jack was when he fell to Willard.


                  27>37

                  And then, after Burnsie lost to JJ he went on to draw the man who killed Luther in the ring.

                  Willard never faced a Burns, never faced a prime anyone and won, didn't even beat an old man as great as the old men Jack beat when he was young. Fitz and Jeffries are both consistent top fives.

                  Willard was ****, never did anything but benefited from a racist society.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                    I already know all about the white champions.

                    Given you never make any threads or posts beyond anything but you opinion it's reasonable to assume I have far more threads and posts covering these guys already stored here at BS.

                    Luther was ass.

                    Carpentier isn't even that good let alone Luther's sad ass and the sad ass tournament of clowns he beat.

                    Anyway, Tommy Burns was a better win for Jack than Jack was for Willard given Burnsie was a decade younger when he fell to Jack than Jack was when he fell to Willard.


                    27>37

                    And then, after Burnsie lost to JJ he went on to draw the man who killed Luther in the ring.

                    Willard never faced a Burns, never faced a prime anyone and won, didn't even beat an old man as great as the old men Jack beat when he was young. Fitz and Jeffries are both consistent top fives.

                    Willard was ****, never did anything but benefited from a racist society.
                    Hahahaha!

                    And to think people oppose partial birth ********.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
                      I am not sure I agree. IMO a 1903-04 Jeffries vs. Johnson is a very different fight than their 1910 go.

                      I guess the best match-up would have been Jeffries staying active until 1907 and the two meeting that year.
                      I think Jeffries comments about it are interesting.





                      No one questioned the outcome or the fact that Johnson had proven himself the better man. Tellingly, Jeffries himself admitted he could never have beaten Johnson, even in his prime. “I could never have whipped Johnson at my best,?he said. “I couldn’t have hit him. No, I couldn’t have reached him in a thousand years.?br />

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP