Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[The Big Dunn]

they would have been hounded and likely subject to violence if they hadnt given a murder verdict... you guys were hysterical,completely out of control and baying for blood

BS racist hyperbole that you have no proof of.

Yea, people were outraged because Chauvin got caught lying and the videos from a diverse set of citizens posted showed this.

You act like being angry in this situation is wrong.

The only reason you are not mad is because you are fine when corrupt white cops like Chauvin lie about any interactions they have with black people.

You also don’t mind when black people, especially black men, are killed needlessly.

[Hector Enrique]

BS racist hyperbole that you have no proof of.

Yea, people were outraged because Chauvin got caught lying and the videos from a diverse set of citizens posted showed this.

You act like being angry in this situation is wrong.

The only reason you are not mad is because you are fine when corrupt white cops like Chauvin lie about any interactions they have with black people.

You also don’t mind when black people, especially black men, are killed needlessly.

it is because you are running on emotion and not objectively analysing the case and the external factors at play

[IceTrayDaGang]

Of course you are. You are trying to force what I posted into this we must go with the jury narrative.

You aren’t saying this to any other poster but me, so clearly you don’t believe this. You are just posting it to avoid discussing why the Chauvin jury verdict is more credible than the King cops or OJ verdicts.

Chauvin’s jury met the standard of the 6th amdment. ( spelled wrong so it isn’t cut out). The jury verdicts in the other cases does not seem to.

If a jury verdict is gerrymandered, like the king and OJ cases, I think it is fair to question them based on rational facts.

You two are questioning the verdict in chauvin’s case based on some idiotic race based conspiracy theory. If you have some rational facts to question, put them out there.

What am I forcing? We should go with the jury's verdict right? That's what you insisted. Or do you agree that sometimes a jury's verdict is not always the right call?

You said it's dumb to think that the jury's for the GF's case was probably scared of the backlash so that's why they found Chauvin guilty... You said that's a dumb way of thinking...

Then you are saying the 1992 case, the trial took place in a town with no black people and with all white jury's which is why they found the cop not guilty... So isn't that also a dumb way of thinking? LOL...

[The Big Dunn]

it is because you are running on emotion and not objectively analysing the case and the external factors at play

No it’s because cops lying angers most rational American citizens because they are supposed to serve and protect all Americans.

His lying in the report is what caused the videos to be posted by angry citizens. You can’t escape that.

Why aren’t you mad that Chauvin lied on the police report?

Of course I am objectively analyzing what happened. You are asking about videos on YouTube and avoiding trial testimonies all know why.

[Hector Enrique]

No it’s because cops lying angers most rational American citizens because they are supposed to serve and protect all Americans.

His lying in the report is what caused the videos to be posted by angry citizens. You can’t escape that.

Why aren’t you mad that Chauvin lied on the police report?

Of course I am objectively analyzing what happened. You are asking about videos on YouTube and avoiding trial testimonies all know why.

okay then give him a charge for that, doesnt mean it was murder, as i said you are obsessed with this police report rather than the video of what actually happened

[The Big Dunn]

What am I forcing? We should go with the jury's verdict right? That's what you insisted. Or do you agree that sometimes a jury's verdict is not always the right call?

You said it's dumb to think that the jury's for the GF's case was probably scared of the backlash so that's why they found Chauvin guilty... You said that's a dumb way of thinking...

Then you are saying the 1992 case, the trial took place in a town with no black people and with all white jury's which is why they found the cop not guilty... So isn't that also a dumb way of thinking? LOL...

I didn’t insist anything. I literally agreed with this point. There is no way you missed it.

I also followed that with the jury in the Chauvin case didn’t make the wrong verdict. I asked you for some facts as to why you think that. You ducked that. Post some facts in support of that point.

Yes it’s a dumb way of thinking. You can’t just spew idiotic conspiracy theories with no facts.

I said in the King cop case the case was moved to an all white town that gave the defense an advantage. That was gerrymandering a jury.

The point I made, using both the king cops and OJ cases, was that gerrymandered juries like those juries do give bad verdicts as you stated.

The next point I made is Chauvin’s jury wasn’t gerrymandered like those juries. As such the jury verdict is more credible in his case.

So unless you can show where you have issues with the jury, it’s a dumb way of thinking. You and Madison are just grasping at anything with no facts to defend Chauvin because the victim is black. That is really what makes it dumb.

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding you had about my point.

[IceTrayDaGang]

I didn’t insist anything. I literally agreed with this point. There is no way you missed it.

I also followed that with the jury in the Chauvin case didn’t make the wrong verdict. I asked you for some facts as to why you think that. You ducked that. Post some facts in support of that point.

Yes it’s a dumb way of thinking. You can’t just spew idiotic conspiracy theories with no facts.

I said in the King cop case the case was moved to an all white town that gave the defense an advantage. That was gerrymandered jury.

The point I made, using both the king cops and OJ cases, was that gerrymandered juries like those juries do give bad verdicts as you stated.

The next point I made is Chauvin’s jury wasn’t gerrymandered like those juries. As such the jury verdict is more credible in his case.

So unless you can show where you have issues with the jury, it’s a dumb way of thinking. You and Madison are just grasping at anything with no facts to defend Chauvin because the victim is black. That is really what makes it dumb.

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding you had about my point.

So a jury's decision is not always the call? Yes or no. That's all.

[The Big Dunn]

okay then give him a charge for that, doesnt mean it was murder, as i said you are obsessed with this police report rather than the video of what actually happened

Don’t play idiot racist. It means he can’t take the stand in his own defense. It means everything he says is unbelievable and lacks credibility- at least in the
minds of fair American citizens.

I am not obsessed with anything. You keep wanting to avoid discussing it because it is the smoking gun. No video can erase his lying.

Chauvin Is in prison because he lied about killing
someone needlessly.’You just will never admit it for reasons I have hated before.

[The Big Dunn]

So a jury's decision is not always the call? Yes or no. That's all.

I answered that in the rest of the post. Stop wasting time pretending you don’t get my answer or point regarding this question

If you honestly believe this, why are you questioning the Chauvin verdict?

[Hector Enrique]

Don’t play idiot racist. It means he can’t take the stand in his own defense. It means everything he says is unbelievable and lacks credibility- at least in the
minds of fair American citizens.

I am not obsessed with anything. You keep wanting to avoid discussing it because it is the smoking gun. No video can erase his lying.

Chauvin Is in prison because he lied about killing
someone needlessly.’You just will never admit it for reasons I have hated before.

you do realise a video exists, why do you keep going on about reports and 'what chauvin said', i dont need to go off 'what chauvin said' because i can see what happened