Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[Hector Enrique]

You mean I am pointing out he lied on the report and that by doing so he compromised himself.

The video doesn’t change that or mitigate it in any way.

You just keep ignoring that because again you are fine that he lied in the report since it was a black dude that he killed.

thats not true, unlike you i am objective, you have built this guy up to be like a god in your community you react the same way as if someone says something bad about allah to a ******, he was a deadbeat junkie whose own decisions got him into that mess

[Pete_The_Man]

quick question, why did the LA riot happened? the jury didnt find those cops guilty so why the uproar?

Well the fact that it took black people to burn down LA to get some kinda justice is the point

Because there is only so much you can take, we saw that the other day with that Rodney Sinton Sr case,the cop killed his son, so he killed a cop

I love his defiant reaction, the way the cops are standing like "Oooh look how deep we are, we're so scary, be scared now black man"

Also last time, the police and racism came up, Colin Kapernick took a knee.

skynews-colin-kaepernick-kneeling-protest_4289135.jpg

What could have been more politically correct, more friendly to ppls tender sensitivities than taken a knee ? There was no riots. No uprisings.

But did you see anyone in the police or public say "O great, well since you negroes asked so politely. We're gonna have legislation. Yes !! Legislation today !! We are going to have the FBI set up a taskforce to round up all the racists who kill blk ppl. Were gonna have laws to put ppl, who call the police on blk ppl, just 4 being blk, in jail"

Did you see that ? Nope

How many times are you going to let someone punch you in the face before you react? That’s what white supremacy asks of the black community. To be perpetually punched in the face while wearing a smile

[The Big Dunn]

Once again, you are making excuses and picking and choosing when to believe the jury.. You said the jury found Chauvin guilty so what's there to argue about?

The jury found those cops not guilty so what's there to argue about?

The other poster suggested that the jury found Chauvin guilty because they didnt want a riot to happen (reason why OJ walked) and you call that dumb..

Now you are trying to say the 1992 case, the trial took place in a town with no black people, impacted the verdict?

Look in the mirror every once in a while my boy!

Why do you call posting facts making an excuse?

Ok I get it, ignore facts that show the difference in the cases to force into a narrative that allows you to defend Chauvin.

Again, not arguing. Pointing out how the not guilty verdict was attained in that case.

Yes I did. Madison avoided the most important reason he was found guilty- he lied on the report and this couldn’t take the stand in his own defense.

You guys like to play dumb. You know that fact makes him look guilty to any rational human being. You also know not being able to take the stand in your own defense hurts the attorney’s ability to defend you. That is why you guys pretend this was some kind of conspiracy verdict.

The OJ case was in Cali so that is a much better comparison.’The way the cops had a mostly white jury, OJ had a mostly black jury. Both cases less than the best AP was assigned. So yeah, I definitely think in both of those cases the gerrymandering of the jury played a role. That wasn’t the case in Minneapolis.

I am not trying to say that I specifically stated the all white jury had an impact on the verdict. The Chauvin jury was very mixed racially.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Well the fact that it took black people to burn down LA to get some kinda justice is the point

Because there is only so much you can take, we saw that the other day with that Rodney Sinton Sr case,the cop killed his son, he killed a cop

I love his defiant reaction, the way the cops are standing like "Oooh look how deep we are, we're so scary, be scared now black man"

But the jury found those cops not guilty.. So we have to go with the jury's decision right?

[Hector Enrique]

Why don’t call posting facts making an excuse?

Ok I get it, ignore facts that show the difference in the cases to force into a narrative that allows you to defend Chauvin.

Again, not arguing. Pointing out how the not guilty verdict was attained in that case.

Yes I did. Madison avoided the most important reason he was found guilty- he lied on the report and this couldn’t take the stand in his own defense.

You guys like to play dumb. You know that fact makes him look guilty to any rational human being. You also know not being able to take the stand in your own defense hurts the attorney’s ability to defend you. That is why you guys pretend this was some kind of conspiracy verdict.

The OJ case was in Cali so that is a much better comparison.’The way the cops had a mostly white jury, OJ had a mostly black jury. Both cases less than the best AP was assigned. So yeah, I definitely think in both of those cases the gerrymandering of the jury played a role. That wasn’t the case in Minneapolis.

I am not trying to say that I specifically stated the all white jury had an impact on the verdict. The Chauvin jury was very mixed racially.

do you not think the jury might have been scared to give an honest verdict...

[IceTrayDaGang]

Why don’t call posting facts making an excuse?

Ok I get it, ignore facts that show the difference in the cases to force into a narrative that allows you to defend Chauvin.

Again, not arguing. Pointing out how the not guilty verdict was attained in that case.

Yes I did. Madison avoided the most important reason he was found guilty- he lied on the report and this couldn’t take the stand in his own defense.

You guys like to play dumb. You know that fact makes him look guilty to any rational human being. You also know not being able to take the stand in your own defense hurts the attorney’s ability to defend you. That is why you guys pretend this was some kind of conspiracy verdict.

The OJ case was in Cali so that is a much better comparison.’The way the cops had a mostly white jury, OJ had a mostly black jury. Both cases less than the best AP was assigned. So yeah, I definitely think in both of those cases the gerrymandering of the jury played a role. That wasn’t the case in Minneapolis.

I am not trying to say that I specifically stated the all white jury had an impact on the verdict. The Chauvin jury was very mixed racially.

Im not ignoring anything!! You were the one who kept bringing up the jury's verdict!!! So we have to go with the jury's decision right?

[The Big Dunn]

thats not true, unlike you i am objective, you have built this guy up to be like a god in your community you react the same way as if someone says something bad about allah to a ******, he was a deadbeat junkie whose own decisions got him into that mess

You are not objective.

I haven’t built him up in any such way. Stop the racist over exaggerating to justify your race based defense of a white cop killing a black man.

I am not ****** so I don’t do anything of the sort. Just an FYI, all very religious people respond in anger when they feel their religion or their G-d is being disparaged.

No, he was a citizen that got killed needlessly by a cop who then lied about it, causing the chain reaction that got him sent to prison.

[The Big Dunn]

do you not think the jury might have been scared to give an honest verdict...

No. The jury was very diverse. It gave an honest verdict based on the evidence.

Maybe Had Chauvin not lied, he could’ve taken the stand in his own defense. His lawyers wouldn’t allow that because they knew he’d just make it worse.

Let’s deal with these facts. Not your racist idiotic conspiracies.

[Hector Enrique]

No. The jury was very diverse. It gave an honest verdict based on the evidence.

Maybe Had Chauvin not lied, he could’ve taken the stand in his own defense. His lawyers wouldn’t allow that because they knew he’d just make it worse.

Let’s deal with these facts. Not your racist idiotic conspiracies.

they would have been hounded and likely subject to violence if they hadnt given a murder verdict... you guys were hysterical,completely out of control and baying for blood

[The Big Dunn]

Im not ignoring anything!! You were the one who kept bringing up the jury's verdict!!! So we have to go with the jury's decision right?

Of course you are. You are trying to force what I posted into this we must go with the jury narrative.

You aren’t saying this to any other poster but me, so clearly you don’t believe this. You are just posting it to avoid discussing why the Chauvin jury verdict is more credible than the King cops or OJ verdicts.

Chauvin’s jury met the standard of the 6th amdment. ( spelled wrong so it isn’t cut out). The jury verdicts in the other cases does not seem to.

If a jury verdict is gerrymandered, like the king and OJ cases, I think it is fair to question them based on rational facts.

You two are questioning the verdict in chauvin’s case based on some idiotic race based conspiracy theory. If you have some rational facts to question, put them out there.