Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are people suddenly defending Sanctioning Bodies?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by 80sFighter View Post
    It's not in a frail state at all. It's in a resilient state where in order to kill it you would need to exterminate the human species.

    One guy ******** everything on his ******uous arena-boxing-league pretending fighters who aren't paying him a fee don't exist is pretty frail.
    Boxing in the US is frail. WHen you get placed as the 11th most popular sport in the us, its frail.

    Limiting viewership makes it frail. Everyone in boxing got comfortable and Lazy and arent true businessman. If you dont think the sports needs something to grow a future, then you are very naive.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Hype job View Post
      If you're losing your marbles over promoter fanboyism, goodness knows how you'll survive witnessing Provodnikov's onslaught against Matthysse.
      Promoter fanboyism. Could careless about any promoter. The promoter/advisor that does what I think is right for the sport is the one that will get my respect.

      Dont get me started on Provo. That FNF fighter got busted up by Algieri, give a a ****ing break with that overrated garbage man Use your head.

      This is what I mean. Things are right in front of you people. Obvious signs, obvious outcomes. Take Kovalev vs Hopins for example. How any gave Hopkins a chance when the writing was on the wall on how shot he was in his prior two fights. Provo's face turns to ash by pillow punchers. The writings on the wall. Read it you ****ing idiots.

      I truly hate most boxing fans. 90% of you arent on my level and thats no joke.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Da Machine View Post
        Boxing in the US is frail. WHen you get placed as the 11th most popular sport in the us, its frail.

        Limiting viewership makes it frail. Everyone in boxing got comfortable and Lazy and arent true businessman. If you dont think the sports needs something to grow a future, then you are very naive.
        With all due respect, and I love living in the US, who cares?

        You could probably pay Dan Rather to tell everyone Chris Algeiri vs Peter Quillin is the fight of the century with star spangled crap everywhere and extras crying like kim jong il's funeral. Maybe it would pull 7 million households and some main****** yuppie idiots at work would mention it the next day.

        Why would any actual boxing fan care though? I don't get the obsession with manipulating and even diminishing the sport to appeal to one indifferent audience. How would it benefit us (or the fighters, most of whom seem to loathe the UFC model)?
        Last edited by ////; 03-09-2015, 09:45 PM.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by 80sFighter View Post
          With all due respect, and I love living in the US, who cares?

          You could probably pay Dan Rather to tell everyone Chris Algeiri vs Peter Quillin is the fight of the century with star spangled crap everywhere and extras crying like kim jong il's funeral. Maybe it would pull 7 million households and some main****** yuppie idiots at work would mention it the next day.

          Why would any actual boxing fan care though? I don't get the obsession with manipulating and even diminishing the sport to appeal to one indifferent audience. How would it benefit us (or the fighters, most of whom seem to loathe the UFC model)?
          Its not about manipulating. They have to put on good fights. What dont you understand about the sport of boxing needing growth and popularity to secure its future? It needs young new stars to take up boxing.

          On its current path, boxings future talent is going to be but a speck of what it could be.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Da Machine View Post
            Haymons investing money into the future of the sport. Thats how you grow a ****ing sport, you woorry about the future, every second of every day.

            These **** heads in the sport today havent done **** for the future of the sport for decades. They just sit back barely promote anc collect there overpriced paychecks from HBO and Now Showtime.

            You dumbasses have the nerver to call me brainwashed. You idiots re brainwashed. If you had it your way boxing would stay in its current frail state forever. Me brainswashed. ****, I coudnt give two ****ing cum shots about Hymen. What I do care about is boxing being promoted properly, to the largest audience possible, because thats what builds stars, thats what keeps a sport a live.
            Your avi is the troll face,yet it fell into your trap. Good show,green k for you.

            Comment


              #66
              I've always advocated for a league style format for boxing. It's working for UFC and the league format works for all other popular sports. This is all about a changing of the guard and right now the ABC orgs are fighting to remain relevant.

              Now - after years of crap they want to work together after before having rules prohibiting unifications (yeah you WBC). People respond negatively to change - it's natural. PBC has an opportunity to inject new life into a sport for far too long clinging onto a bygone era of business. It's a history filled to the brim with corruption, back-door deals, slave contracts and misappropriation of the fighters.

              I don't know if Haymon and his initiative will succeed - but they are certainly paving the way for meaningful change. If they can eliminate the WBA, WBO, WBC and IBF or even have them create a merge entity, then that will be a success.

              Comment


                #67
                i don't understand why anyone would want UFC/WWE corporation.. yes not state, national, international, not a WORLD sport but a company branded boxing championship that only Haymon signed boxers can fight for, basically dividing the sport from itself entirely

                how insignificant and misleading to the public.. the ABC's were one thing this is is a whole different disgusting beast

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by JmH Reborn View Post
                  If they can eliminate the WBA, WBO, WBC and IBF or even have them create a merge entity, then that will be a success.
                  the only thing i want is exactly that, for them to merge after every division is unified with an established REAL champion in some sort of unification tournament(would probably take a couple of years), and then after that will just assume the name WBC, WBA or whichever they decide fits best for the one merged sanctioning body

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Da Machine View Post
                    LMAO, you guys are ****ing bipolar. Honestly, I cant believe people even care about the belts anymore. I cant remember the last time I cared about the belts.

                    I hope Haymon creates one centralized PBC belt and eliminated the need for sanctioning bodies. And people would **** on that as if the WBC is the savoir of boxing. I just really dont understand people. They let bias and perceptions cloud their judgement even if its completely against what they originally stood for.
                    Everybody loves belts, just not 4+ per class; However, most all would prefer the 4+ belts now, that are GLOBALLY ASSESSABLE, compared to this subway stable pimpin PBC bull**** belt I been hearing about.

                    This is all about greedy, shady Haymond and his vision of monopolizing the sport.

                    Boxing is great because it is globally assessable. Boxers are mercenaries, not ****n hoes.
                    The dream of becoming CHAMPION is so beautiful because anyone can compete, in any country. The GOATs would have never been with this PBC setup, as it will just lock talent out globally.

                    The more I hear about this PBC shyt, the more I honestly respect the main sanctioning bodies.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      I don't know why anyone would defend these sanctioning bodies. They are a big reason why boxing is in trouble. There is only one true world championship in each weight division. This is not represented by any belt but is actually a title like king of England, or chairman of the board, that is handed down from one man to another according to a clear and identifiable set of rules. You either are or you aren't. There is no 'shares' of it. There is no 'unifying' it. You have either won the right to be called champion or not. The belts are just minor prizes that can be won.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP