yes it was shocking,pure hometown decision.dirrell outboxed froch for 90% of the fight.froch was the one cheating,frustrated that he was hitting air-the ref was terrible too
i was very disappointed for dirrell,the fact that he loses his '0' due to where the fight was staged and not what actually happened in the ring.disgusting.
No, a robbery is a decision that is at least three rounds wrong in my opinion. Froch-Dirrell was a close fight because of Dirrell's inactivity and lack of aggression. Dirrell could have taken a lopsided decision if he'd engaged a little more. I was at the fight and I'm the first to admit that I scored it wrong on the night thanks to my view, scoring it to Froch by 2 points. Watching it again on television I scored it to Dirrell by a round. Doesn't classify as a robbery.
Come on fellas, you all know the real answer is Funeka-Guzman, and it shouldn't even be disputed. Forget Froch-Dirrell and Diaz-Malignaggi, they were at least close in reality. Funeka got flat-out robbed after making Guzman his ***** for the majority of their fight.
Comment