Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Dirrell-Froch the biggest robbery of 2009?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    hell no

    DIRREL could be more active and he would won easy

    Comment


      #12
      it was a close fight but dirrell didn't do much, it looked like he landed about 5 punches per round and dirrell did look like the better boxer but u don't get style points froch look like he was tryin to make the fight and bein that dirrell was not landin that much per round u could say most rounds were damn near even

      Comment


        #13
        Funeka-Guzman was more one sided.

        Although that one ended in a draw, I don't know of anyone who scored it any other way than in Funeka's favour, whereas a decent number of people scored Froch-Dirrell for Froch.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Method Checker View Post
          I still don't know how some people can even dare attempt to say that Froch won it. Dirrell truly outclassed Froch and made him his *****.

          no it was easily martinez vs. kermit citron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by GODd*ll*nGer View Post
            Damn if that reel was the whole story or a good deal of it, Dirrell beat Carl Froch the fu ck up.
            It wasn't.

            Comment


              #16
              It was a close fight, not a robbery. Dirrell could have gotten the decision, but I think he needed to be a little more aggressive in those middle rounds. He really dug deep in the later rounds, but he will just have to work harder.

              Comment


                #17
                Most ppl feel Dirrell won, however he only has himself to blame for the decision not going his way. for the first 7 or 8 rounds he was holding, complaining, and flat our running which made the fight nearly unwatchable. If he actually fought the entire time, he would of won.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Klitschko vs Johnson

                  Comment


                    #19
                    To the people who say Dirrell wasn't exchanging enough to win: by that logic, Willie Pep should have lost most of his fights.

                    Dirrell was on the defensive and defensiveness is part of boxing. He was landing more shots and the cleaner ones, might I add.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      If Dirrell deserved to lose, so did ****ing Haye. Haye ran a track meet style fight, throwing the least amount of punches EVER in a heavyweight title fight.
                      Last edited by Boxing Scene; 01-20-2010, 04:52 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP