I can't believe Canelo fans are really out there trying to say BJS has a chance on the cards

[Shadoww702]

Not about white, black or red. It's about green. Canelo makes everyone money. If he had 10 losses, he wouldn't be the draw that he is. He will not lose any reasonably close fight on the scorecards. The judges have their marching orders.

That's where I believe your wrong. Oscar had what 10??? Lewis? Tyson? Holyfield???

JJC, JMM, Barrera... AJ?

Real knows real

[Boxing-1013]

I actually thought GGG did a lot better in the second fight.

I think the scores in fights 1 and 2 were similar. Canelo fights well for the first few and last few. But even in those rounds he has no real clear rounds. And then in the middle rounds he gets outworked pretty heavily and GGG has the best shots of those rounds. I don't really care but for the life of me I can't see how anyone scored those as anything other than clear GGG wins. Canelo just got outworked.

[TernceBudCharlo]

I think the scores in fights 1 and 2 were similar. Canelo fights well for the first few and last few. But even in those rounds he has no real clear rounds. And then in the middle rounds he gets outworked pretty heavily and GGG has the best shots of those rounds. I don't really care but for the life of me I can't see how anyone scored those as anything other than clear GGG wins. Canelo just got outworked.

I laugh at all these people who say that Lara got dominated because "there's no way you can win the fight circling around the ring and staying on the ropes the whole time." But then said Canelo easily won the first fight lol.

[ShoulderRoll]

Absolutely embarrassing dude lol

Yes, you are. I agree.

Canelo has never gotten a robbery win, not one time, over someone that beat him clearly.

[_Rexy_]

History shows us that if you can beat Canelo clearly you will get the decision on the cards.

That's the thing, though...you have to beat him clearly like Floyd did.

Golovkin couldn't clearly separate himself from Canelo in 24 rounds and instead got into close fights with him that could have gone either way. His fans keep crying about it to this day but it is what it is.

If Saunders can win clearly then he should have no trouble getting the decision on the cards.

Canelo won one round at best in that fight, and the three judges scored it 6-6, 8-4 and 9-3 and that was against the biggest name in the ****ing world, and the biggest "A-Side" of all time.

[GrandpaBernard]

If Floyd could outbox Canelo and win on the cards why can't Saunders?

He just has to be good enough to do it.

Floyd was the most influential figure in boxing at that time

Billy is far from that

[ShoulderRoll]

Floyd was the most influential figure in boxing at that time

Billy is far from that

Floyd won because he was clearly better than Canelo. Being an influential figure had nothing to do with it.

If Saunders can clearly be better I would expect him to get the win too.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Canelo won one round at best in that fight, and the three judges scored it 6-6, 8-4 and 9-3 and that was against the biggest name in the ****ing world, and the biggest "A-Side" of all time.

Here are the rules for scoring a Canelo Alvarez fight.

1) If Canelo Alvarez fights off the back foot, he is the ring general and wins the round. That means he is WALKING DOWN his opponent and should be rewarded for his effective aggression.

2) If Canelo Alvarez is the aggressor, that means the opponent is running and shouldn't win the round. Runners don't deserve to win fights.

3) Jabs do not count. A landed jab is not a scoring blow.

4) A power punch to the body, even if it is blocked by the forearms or elbows, counts three times as much as a power punch to the head.

[Shadoww702]

Canelo won one round at best in that fight, and the three judges scored it 6-6, 8-4 and 9-3 and that was against the biggest name in the ****ing world, and the biggest "A-Side" of all time.

Have you seen that fight recently???

It's not as bad as I remembered...

End of the day the RIGHT boxer won..

Did Lara deserve to win for doing the opposite of Floyd Defense with ZERO offense embedded?

Trout??? Knowing he losing but saying no mas??? Which is WHAT he Did!!!!

Did Trout go for any hail mary's???

Do you even know what that means???

[GrandpaBernard]

Floyd won because he was clearly better than Canelo. Being an influential figure had nothing to do with it.

If Saunders can clearly be better I would expect him to get the win too.

I hope your third sentence is correct

Alvarez gon be one very annoying fighter if no one who earned a decision over him gets it