Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The truth about feminism.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    squealpiggy is buddha reincarnate. i'm a fan tbh.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      No. I was the guy who didn't side with the 20 sociopathic rapists who tortured him.
      - He got off easy.He should've been impaled alive on a stake , (Vlade Tepes style) , on national tv for everyone to see !

      Tolerance is so morally noble , especially when you're not that dead child's father. Let me guess , you're against death penalty too right ?
      Personally ,i think lex talionis should be the norm. Our forefathers had it right. Eye for eye & tooth for tooth.

      What's a torn rectum compared to the murder of a defenseless child ?


      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      What... "sodomitic-******* conformists"? I'd describe this as word-salad but not all of them are even words.
      - This is my immature way of expressing my love for a wise sage like you.

      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      You just described your mother as a commodity. Let that sink in
      - Well, isn't she ? Aren't all women acting like objects for men to be desired ? (hypocritical feminists included)

      Women think their vagina is made of gold , however they're also aware of the competition. So in order to sell themselves to the highest bidder (future hubby) , they spend a ridiculous amount of money on makeup , ***y lingery , sublimating their physical ***uality & attractiveness , all for what ? For the potential buyers (men). Because they know their attractiveness is their ticket to free sh't. (aka financial security).

      Pus@y is a man's kryptonite. That's why prostitution will never die out. And that's why all women act like commodities. Their value is based on how much we desire them & our value is based on how much we can offer them. And as they get older , their choice gets smaller & smaller. (That's why plastic surgeons are making a fortune).

      But all of this doesn't mean "love" can't exist. But i'm just being realistic here. The odds of a hot woman falling in love at first sight with a bum (even an handsome one) on the street only happens in films. & sure ,women can also be physically attracted by men , and have genuine ***ual desires , etc...But all of this takes nothing away from the fact that the vast majority of them act as commodities.


      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      You're not being cynical, you're being ******.
      - I humbly apologise, oh mighty piggy.

      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      The answer, as ever, is that it's a bit more complicated than that. I'm not going to bother explaining the evolutionary basis of altruism to a moron like you though."
      You're too kind my lord. (We could even argue that altruism is a form of selfishness)


      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      You have to be kidding. You have clearly not read The Selfish Gene to come to this sop****ric conclusion.
      I have. But i wonder if you understood any of it.



      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      You're a p@ssy aren't you? Do you own a fedora?
      Meow !



      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
      That doesn't mean I have any illusions that the Youtuber in question conveys any clarity. It's just that by comparison he cannot possibly be any worse than you are.
      What else can i say ? You have brilliantly destroyed my arguments sir. And you're right , i've rewatched this guy's video , and i'll admit...I was a fool for posting it in the first place.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
        You're talking about fringe feminism, not modern feminism.
        We're talking about modern feminism, not "fringe feminism". You didn't even watch the video, so all your responses are hollow.

        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
        I'll add analogies to the list of things you don't understand.
        You compared diversity in feminism to the diversity that exists in sport. You believe there is as much diversity in feminism as there is in sports. You're that ******.

        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
        You just described your mother as a commodity. Let that sink in.
        Your responses are always so weak, piggy. You had to get personal with him, instead of responding to his point.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by gandhalf View Post
          - He got off easy.He should've been impaled alive on a stake , (Vlade Tepes style) , on national tv for everyone to see !

          Tolerance is so morally noble , especially when you're not that dead child's father. Let me guess , you're against death penalty too right ?
          Personally ,i think lex talionis should be the norm. Our forefathers had it right. Eye for eye & tooth for tooth.

          What's a torn rectum compared to the murder of a defenseless child ?
          It's interesting to see that you believe that justice can be meted out by gangs of violent rapists.

          - Well, isn't she ? Aren't all women acting like objects for men to be desired ? (hypocritical feminists included)
          No. Given your archaic and reprehensible views about women it's suddenly making sense that you find rapists and murderers to be noble champions of righteousness.

          Women think their vagina is made of gold , however they're also aware of the competition. So in order to sell themselves to the highest bidder (future hubby) , they spend a ridiculous amount of money on makeup , ***y lingery , sublimating their physical ***uality & attractiveness , all for what ? For the potential buyers (men). Because they know their attractiveness is their ticket to free sh't. (aka financial security).

          Pus@y is a man's kryptonite. That's why prostitution will never die out. And that's why all women act like commodities. Their value is based on how much we desire them & our value is based on how much we can offer them. And as they get older , their choice gets smaller & smaller. (That's why plastic surgeons are making a fortune).

          But all of this doesn't mean "love" can't exist. But i'm just being realistic here. The odds of a hot woman falling in love at first sight with a bum (even an handsome one) on the street only happens in films. & sure ,women can also be physically attracted by men , and have genuine ***ual desires , etc...But all of this takes nothing away from the fact that the vast majority of them act as commodities.
          This is seriously pathetic. Your hatred of women (and it is hatred) is based entirely on your own feelings of inadequacy. You are choosing to justify your inability to relate to women by claiming that women are all calculating gold-diggers when your real problem is that you consider them to be objects for your own gratification.

          What else can i say ? You have brilliantly destroyed my arguments sir. And you're right , i've rewatched this guy's video , and i'll admit...I was a fool for posting it in the first place.
          You're a fool for borrowing your personal opinions from a random youtube video.

          Originally posted by takingaim View Post
          We're talking about modern feminism, not "fringe feminism". You didn't even watch the video, so all your responses are hollow.
          Also on Youtube is Anita Sarkeesian's incoherent rambling about popular culture. The existence of a video is not compelling reason to watch it.

          You compared diversity in feminism to the diversity that exists in sport. You believe there is as much diversity in feminism as there is in sports. You're that ******.
          It was a satirical analogy using exaggeration in order to make a point. Jonathan Swift would be turning in his grave.

          Your responses are always so weak, piggy. You had to get personal with him, instead of responding to his point.
          His point? You mean "Watch this Youtube video"? That was the only point he offered.

          Comment


            #25
            And the video is in French.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
              Also on Youtube is Anita Sarkeesian's incoherent rambling about popular culture. The existence of a video is not compelling reason to watch it.
              This thread was created because of that video you dope. You started posting in this thread but you didn't bother watching the video.

              Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
              It was a satirical analogy using exaggeration in order to make a point. Jonathan Swift would be turning in his grave.
              And now you're attempting to save face because you realise how dumb your comparison was. lol

              Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
              His point? You mean "Watch this Youtube video"? That was the only point he offered.
              His point about how women are commodities & men are walking ATM machines.

              You just further proved my point - your responses are always so weak.

              Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
              And the video is in French.
              Are you really this ******? It has English subtitles.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by takingaim View Post
                This thread was created because of that video you dope. You started posting in this thread but you didn't bother watching the video.
                Feminism is a Marxist idea replacing class struggle with gender struggle, the proletariat with women and the bourgeoisie with the patriarchy.

                Problem is that not all feminism is predicated on the concept of the patriarchy.

                And now you're attempting to save face because you realise how dumb your comparison was. lol
                "lol" indeed.

                His point about how women are commodities & men are walking ATM machines.

                You just further proved my point - your responses are always so weak.
                Oh, you mean the one in which he declared that women were not only objects existing purely for his own gratification, but that also they were evil harpies?

                It's funny that so-called ******** are derided for being "feminine" or "weak" and yet reactionaries like you are your little bum-chum here are all, without fail, nothing more than frightened and intimidated little boys angrily puffing up your chests in the face of imaginary persecution.

                Are you really this ******? It has English subtitles.
                So it could have a transcript that I could read in under a minute. Instead it has seven minutes of a French man slowly bloviating about how feminism is the same as communism.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                  Problem is that not all feminism is predicated on the concept of the patriarchy.
                  Modern feminism is.

                  Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                  Oh, you mean the one in which he declared that women were not only objects existing purely for his own gratification, but that also they were evil harpies?
                  You didn't understand his point. How tragic.

                  Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                  It's funny that so-called ******** are derided for being "feminine" or "weak" and yet reactionaries like you are your little bum-chum here are all, without fail, nothing more than frightened and intimidated little boys angrily puffing up your chests in the face of imaginary persecution.
                  The only imaginary persecution is that which exists in the minds of feminists.

                  Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                  So it could have a transcript that I could read in under a minute. Instead it has seven minutes of a French man slowly bloviating about how feminism is the same as communism.
                  You're such a petulant little ****.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    started at a time when there were legitimate gripes. Now there aren't any. So proponents have to bellyache about strippers and stuff.

                    Remember "Comparable Worth?"

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by aiza55 View Post
                      started at a time when there were legitimate gripes. Now there aren't any. So proponents have to bellyache about strippers and stuff.

                      Remember "Comparable Worth?"
                      I'm not sure how you can argue that there are no legitimate gripes in a thread where somebody has claimed that women exist for the gratification of men and see men as wallets and bank machines.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP