A question for the *************

[Kris Silver]

Your the kind of tard that has to pidgeon hole people into neat little piles of shīt with a pretty bow on it. Your also trying some idiots guide to psych which reeks of douche baggery to no end. Your an idiot and yes the standards you hold for yourself you dont have to hold for society as a whole. I can expect these same standsrds from my family and the friends I choose to have and thats about as far as my presumptions go for how I expect people to act in my life. If reality was how you surmise it to be then we would all be a little psychotic and be completely understanding and even sympathetic of serial killers becauee thats a standard society holds. People have layers like an onion lmao Schrek is smarter than you.

Just as I guessed then. What the fuck are you rambling on about you embarassment?

YOU started preaching about standards you expect of people whilst for one thing prejudicing people whom abort whilst selling yourself as a libertarian.

I pointed out there was contradictions in some of your statements against the simplest cores of libertarianism.

This whole thing would've been a lot easier if you: A) Didn't mis-represent yourself, B) Understood what libertarianism was in the first place, C) accepted some of your comments were at odd's with what you described youself as, D) In failing all the above be a big enough adult to bother to go to dictionary.com now and accept a couple of the clear points at least.

You chose E) Fail to understand the simplest of explanations and act like an entirely rude idiot infront of people to make yourself look even worse.

You clearly can't converse rationally, were done.

[Kris Silver]

You're wrong about Libertarianism. though I personally dislike the term [too many post-left Anarchists in that camp] Now...if he is a strong Christian man then you may throw the "Judge not, lest ye be judged" at him.

Can't argue with what your saying here, but there were several quotes I was attempting to highlight and simplify. In terms of the underlined, agreed.

[One_Tycoon]

Just as I guessed then. What the fuck are you rambling on about you embarassment?

YOU started preaching about standards you expect of people whilst for one thing prejudicing people whom abort whilst selling yourself as a libertarian.

I pointed out there was contradictions in some of your statements against the simplest cores of libertarianism.

This whole thing would've been a lot easier if you: A) Didn't mis-represent yourself, B) Understood what libertarianism was in the first place, C) accepted some of your comments were at odd's with what you described youself as, D) In failing all the above be a big enough adult to bother to go to dictionary.com now and accept a couple of the clear points at least.

You chose E) Fail to understand the simplest of explanations and act like an entirely rude idiot infront of people to make yourself look even worse.

You clearly can't converse rationally, were done.

Why can't you embrace individual liberty and reject this totalitarian mindset of yours? Manny Fresh may also be in favor drug legalization, that doesn't mean that he himself will go out and use drugs....as he may personally see it as detrimental to his health and productivity or society as a whole [but he won't stop you from using it]. This further adds to my problem with the term Libertarianism - as the word has been co-opted and used by Leftists.

There is this:




Then there is this:



The so called "Libertarianism" and it's snob advocates claim that it is above the Left/Right politics....but clearly it is not. You need to divide it into two groups once again, since the Right-wing side of it tends to be for individual freedom and Capitalism to make it all happen...while the one of the left-wing variety tends to be Collectivist in nature [even if they've given up on Big govt making it happen]

[Kris Silver]

Why can't you embrace individual liberty and reject this totalitarian mindset of yours? Manny Fresh may also be in favor drug legalization, that doesn't mean that he himself will go out and use drugs....as he may personally see it as detrimental to his health and productivity or society as a whole [but he won't stop you from using it]. This further adds to my problem with the term Libertarianism - as the word has been co-opted and used by Leftists.

There is this:



Then there is this:



The so called "Libertarianism" and it's snob advocates claim that it is above the Left/Right politics....but clearly it is not. You need to divide it into two groups once again, the Right-wing side of it tends to be for individual freedom, Capitalism to make it all happen...while the one of the left-wing variety tends to be Collectivist in nature [even if they've given up on Big govt making it happen]

This is valuable and rational conversation so thank-you. Now...I'm a little tired of Mannie and this but here:

Im libertarian. Dont care about gays, women having ********s etc. Me personally I wouldnt go for ******** but thats me. I hold higher standards for myself as an individual than I do for society as a whole. No I totally am. The way I want my government to rule is libertarian.

With the rise of the Enlightenment, the word acquired decisively more positive undertones, being defined as "free from narrow prejudice" in 1781 and "free from bigotry"

Proclaims self as libertarian plain and simple. Done. *******ism requires at least a sense of equality. The rest of the sentence in no way shape of form infers a view of equal, in-fact it suggests a view of being above anyone whom chooses to abort something as simple and hugely broad as pregnancy. Not even defining what scenario's or reasonings why (health, lack of funds, education, family unit). Done. Watch that be backtracked on now though. *******. Prejudices against those whom abort. Sorry, that's not overly *******. It's turned into a needless can of worms now though.

[ßringer]

Thats the old guard again. Most "young" **********s are for legalization and taxation and regulation of pot. Besides its use in pain relief is far better than pain killers for nerve damage.

The bolded is an absolute lie in my experience.

Marijuana is a mild pain reliever, at best. Better than over the counter pain relievers like ibuprofen, aleve, and advil, but much less effective than even the most docile of prescription painkillers.

Compared to percocet, oxycontin, and morphine, Marijuana's pain relieving capabilities are downright laughable.

THC does have certain medical applications, though. They're just vastly overrated by potheads who think it's a cure all.

[Derranged]

I gots me some boots that er good fer stompin ****** n colereds.. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE DOGGIE!!

[~AK49~]

Lol at alcohol drinkers pretending they're on the moral high ground.

Also lol at people who swear by science going full ****** and ignoring all the science that says/has shown marijuana to relieve chronic pain. I know from first hand experience by some around me that it is extremely effective, and more then first hand experience, science has shown it to be correct. But whatever, be stuck in your stone age beliefs

[One_Tycoon]

:




With the rise of the Enlightenment, the word acquired decisively more positive undertones, being defined as "free from narrow prejudice" in 1781 and "free from bigotry"

Figures...you're ascribing to the Libertarianism that you picked out of the "*******" umbrella. So it's all just semantics and words need to be explained. Just like Capitalism no longer means what Carl Marx wanted it to mean when he started using the term. Mannie took up a on ********.

But if I remember correctly...Mannie is a convert as he admitted to voting for ***** in the past and said that he is against Monopolies in one of my threads. He has taken a lot of leftist positions in the past before. I myself had to take him to the Koch brothers woodshed to straighten him out on occasion. So he does tend to swing both ways.

[SkillspayBills]

Figures...you're ascribing to the Libertarianism that you picked out of the "*******" umbrella. So it's all just semantics and words need to be explained. Just like Capitalism no longer means what Carl Marx wanted it to mean when he started using the term. Mannie took up a on ********.

But if I remember correctly...Mannie is a convert as he admitted to voting for ***** in the past and said that he is against Monopolies in one of my threads. He has taken a lot of leftist positions in the past before. I myself had to take him to the Koch brothers woodshed to straighten him out on occasion. So he does tend to swing both ways.

You didn't answer the thread or make any poignant points. Nice job CupoCity.

[ßringer]

Lol at alcohol drinkers pretending they're on the moral high ground.

Also lol at people who swear by science going full ****** and ignoring all the science that says/has shown marijuana to relieve chronic pain. I know from first hand experience by some around me that it is extremely effective, and more then first hand experience, science has shown it to be correct. But whatever, be stuck in your stone age beliefs

LOL at pussified ****s making rebuttals without having the balls to actually call the person they're calling a ****** out by name.

And yeah, I have firsthand experience with it, too. When I had to have a chest tube installed in my back to relieve the pressure caused by a pheumothorax (lung collapse) and was in a constant state of pain (felt like being stabbed everytime I inhaled), I had a chance to really test marijuana's capacity for pain relief.

It was underwhelming, to say the least.

Morphine, on the other hand...

Funny that you'd mistake me for someone who was anti-marijuana, though. Obviously you've never read my posts on the subject.

I'm not anti-marijuana, nor am I ignorant of it's medical benefits (I have firsthand experience with those, as well) - I'm anti-potheads who swear that smoking pot is actually good for you.