Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A question for the *************

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
    Im libertarian. Dont care about gays, women having ********s etc. Me personally I wouldnt go for ******** but thats me. I hold higher standards for myself as an individual than I do for society as a whole.
    You're a libertarian that happily tolerates peoples rights to ********, whilst at the same time seemingly judging them as of low standards and below you?

    That's astonishly contradictive and self righteous. You just broke a core component of libertarianism, equality without prejudice.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post
      You're a libertarian that happily tolerates peoples rights to ********, whilst at the same time seemingly judging them as of low standards and below you?

      That's astonishly contradictive and self righteous. You just broke a core component of libertarianism, equality without prejudice.
      Dont give a fiyuk about your definition. Of coarse I hold myself to a higher standard than I do others. Most people actually do. Only ever knocked up one woman my wife. Always take the necessary precautions. If I had or discover I have a kid from back in the day Ill love them and take care of them. Id never kill any of my offspring prebirth or after. If you want to do that go ahead. Ill never do that.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
        Dont give a fiyuk about your definition.
        Not mine, it's a factual definition of what you're describing yourself as.

        Of coarse I hold myself to a higher standard than I do others. Most people actually do. Only ever knocked up one woman my wife. Always take the necessary precautions. If I had or discover I have a kid from back in the day Ill love them and take care of them. Id never kill any of my offspring prebirth. If you want to do that go ahead. Ill never do that.
        There's 7 billion of us and you think every single one has the funds, life style, up bringing, education, fortunate start in life, family unit, good health, no heraditary conditions and so much more to; either A) avoid pregnancy 100% of the time, or B) If they are to behave to what you regard as good standards, never abort?

        Meanwhile you call yourself a libertarian whilst not understanding it's simplest definition and act it total contrary to it.

        Where to begin with you. Whatever you say you are, you are....n't.

        Comment


          #14
          You have a funny perception there, in the U.S, about this term, "conservative"...

          I dare to recommend you a very short opus by a great British thinker:

          "On Being Conservative" (Michael Oakeshott)

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post
            Not mine, it's a factual definition of what you're describing yourself as.



            There's 7 billion of us and you think every single one has the funds, life style, up bringing, education, fortunate start in life, family unit, good health, no heraditary conditions and so much more to; either A) avoid pregnancy 100% of the time, or B) If they are to behave to what you regard as good standards, never abort?

            Meanwhile you call yourself a libertarian whilst not understanding it's simplest definition and act it total contrary to it.

            Where to begin with you. Whatever you say you are, you are....n't.
            No I totally am. The way I want my government to rule is libertarian. THe way I live my is to my standards. My standards should not be enforced on others. The standards you hold for yourself are not necessarily the standards others hold for themselves and so should not be the law of the land. How the hell do combine your political views with your personal views so tightly? I understand how personal views can affect your political views but to completely combine them is so limiting and finite that I dont see how anybody does that.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
              No I totally am. The way I want my government to rule is libertarian. THe way I live my is to my standards. My standards should not be enforced on others. The standards you hold for yourself are not necessarily the standards others hold for themselves and so should not be the law of the land. How the hell do combine your political views with your personal views so tightly? I understand how personal views can affect your political views but to completely combine them is so limiting and finite that I dont see how anybody does that.
              You're clouding what was a concise point.

              The bottom line is you sold yourself as a libertarian but then came off extremely self righteous, prejudice, and very un-empathatic to others situations and rights to choice without prejudice. I pointed out how some of these comments were fairly directly contradictive of what are factual definitions of libertarianism. You've responded not being big enough to accept or address that, and shown you didn't even know these basic definitions of what you are describing yourself as.

              You're the one whom chose to bring up and sell yourself as something, I've merely pointed out pretty basic concise contradictions to that, and uncovered your ignorance to what it even is. It's not on me to figure that out, it's yours.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post
                You're clouding what was a concise point.

                The bottom line is you sold yourself as a libertarian but then came off extremely self righteous, prejudice, and very uhts to choice without prejudice. I pointed out how some of these comments were fairly directly contradictive of what are factual definitions of libertarianism. You've responded not being big enough to accept or address that, and shown you didn't even know these basic definitions of what you are describing yourself as.

                You're the one whom chose to bring up and sell yourself as something, I've merely pointed out pretty basic concise contradictions to that, and uncovered your ignorance to what it even is. It's not on me to figure that out, it's yours.
                Your the kind of tard that has to pidgeon hole people into neat little piles of shīt with a pretty bow on it. Your also trying some idiots guide to psych which reeks of douche baggery to no end. Your an idiot and yes the standards you hold for yourself you dont have to hold for society as a whole. I can expect these same standsrds from my family and the friends I choose to have and thats about as far as my presumptions go for how I expect people to act in my life. If reality was how you surmise it to be then we would all be a little psychotic and be completely understanding and even sympathetic of serial killers becauee thats a standard society holds. People have layers like an onion lmao Schrek is smarter than you.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
                  Thats the old guard again. Most "young" **********s are for legalization and taxation and regulation of pot. Besides its use in pain relief is far better than pain killers for nerve damage.
                  I have noticed this as well. Most young **********s lean much more towards the libertarian side of politics. Socially ******* while being fiscally conservative, quite the potent combination.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1520 View Post
                    I have a sincere question to the ************* in the lounge. It seems every time I read a conservative web site, blog or listen to Foxnews commentary, they are preaching the same thing over and over again.
                    Of course you got it from Fox News.





                    So my question is, why do ************* then want to tell women what to do with their bodies regarding pregnancy, want to tell people who they can marry, and want to tell people what god to worship?

                    It seems that ************* would be the front lines for things like gay rights, separation of church and state, and the pro choice movement. They seem to stand so much for the 2nd *********, but ignore the 1st one.

                    Why then the contradiction?
                    What an original question. No really....we haven't heard this one asked before.

                    Personally I'm fine with ********s and Gay rights/marriage. Most people who champion Gay rights/marriage and/or are Gay themselves, are pro-choice or go out and have ********s...tend to be ********s/Progressives/leftists....the more of them don't reproduce, the better. It's a good conservative position to have.
                    Last edited by One_Tycoon; 01-15-2014, 08:27 PM.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Kris Silver View Post
                      You're clouding what was a concise point.

                      The bottom line is you sold yourself as a libertarian but then came off extremely self righteous, prejudice, and very un-empathatic to others situations and rights to choice without prejudice. I pointed out how some of these comments were fairly directly contradictive of what are factual definitions of libertarianism.
                      You're wrong about Libertarianism. though I personally dislike the term [too many post-left Anarchists in that camp] Now...if he is a strong Christian man then you may throw the "Judge not, lest ye be judged" at him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP