What will the excuses be, I wonder?
I've enlarged the parts I find the most interesting. I'm pretty sure I've read somewhere that this only accounts for 2 years, at that, because only the firm that split with Trump would release the documents.
Former President Trump took in at least $7.8 million from foreign en****** in 20 countries, according to a new report from ********s on the House Oversight Committee, payments to his various businesses that critics say could violate a constitutional prohibition on accepting funding from foreign governments.
The volume of foreign payments during Trump’s presidency is detailed in one of the most exhaustive reviews of Trump’s business dealings with foreign governments while in office.
********s cautioned the total figure is likely larger, and they blasted GOP leadership they’ve accused of releasing Trump’s accounting firm Mazars from turning over requested documents just four months after a years-long legal battle forced it to comply with a congressional subpoena.
“Critically, even this subset of documents reveals a stunning web of millions of dollars in payments made by foreign governments and their agents directly to Trump-owned businesses, while President Trump was in the White House,” ********s wrote in their report.
“By pocketing foreign states’ payments, President Trump repeatedly placed his personal financial interest and the interests of foreign wealth and power above the public interest, resulting in precisely the split loyalty between foreign power and the American people that the Framers sought to avoid.”
The lion’s share of the foreign money — some $5.6 million — flowed from China, which, along with other countries, primarily patronized three properties: Trump hotels in Washington and Las Vegas and Trump Tower in New York.
Concerned the billionaire hotelier’s businesses would be a magnet for foreign spending, ethics experts have long sounded the alarm that Trump’s properties would be a route for violating the emoluments clause of the constitution, which prohibits the president and other government officials from receiving profit or gain because of their role.
The report comes as the GOP is seeking to highlight the extent relatives of President *****, mainly his son Hunter *****, conducted business with foreign governments, including China.
While did conduct millions of dollars of business with Chinese companies and investors, the review of Trump’s business ledgers showed income from Chinese government sources like China’s Embassy in the U.S. and the Chinese state-affiliated Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC).
ICBC spent $5.4 million over nearly three years for a lease at Trump Tower.
The report also covers Trump’s business with other Chinese companies that would not trigger emoluments clause violations but that have otherwise been under scrutiny.
The records show that CEFC, a private Chinese energy company that also did business with Hunter *****, spent more than $5 million on an apartment in Trump World Tower through its subsidiary.
Oversight **********s dismissed the report as part of an “obsession” with Trump.
“Former President Trump has legitimate businesses but the *****s do not. The *****s and their associates made over $24 million by cashing in on the ***** name in China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Romania. No goods or services were provided other than access to Joe ***** and the ***** network,” Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.
However, a Washington Post fact-check found that within that pool of foreign business dealings, just $7.5 million went to ***** family members, with roughly $7 million going directly to Hunter *****.
The fact check also said many of those businesses were not shell companies, as Comer claimed, but were organized around legitimate business activities or investments.
Other countries that patronized Trump’s businesses include Saudi Arabia, with more than $615,000 spent at his properties, and Qatar, which spent more than $460,000.
When Trump was running for office in 2015, he boasted of his good relationship with the Saudis based on his business dealings.
“Saudi Arabia, I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million,” he said at a campaign rally.
“Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much!”
The payments from the Saudi government and its royal family came as the country was working to secure a $100 billion arms deal with the U.S., spending money at Trump properties the month he signed the May 2019 deal.
While the report offers significant insights into Trump’s business activities, it notes shortcomings in documenting the larger picture, writing that what was uncovered was likely a fraction of total spending.
Mazars was either never provided or did not retain key records, the report says, while accusing Comer of releasing the company from providing the records won in a court battle.
House Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) in March pointed to from Trump attorney Patrick Strawbridge saying, “I do not know the status of Mazars production, but my understanding is that the committee has no interest in forcing Mazars to complete it and is willing to release it from further obligations under the settlement agreement.”
Comer denied that at the time.
“There has been no coordination or discussion with anyone from the committee’s majority with anyone about the Mazars documents,” Comer spokesman Jessica Collins said in a statement to The Washington Post, calling the allegations “completely unfounded and untrue.”
The report follows another review earlier this year documenting Trump’s failure to disclose more than .
The Hill has reached out to the Trump campaign for comment.
I've enlarged the parts I find the most interesting. I'm pretty sure I've read somewhere that this only accounts for 2 years, at that, because only the firm that split with Trump would release the documents.
Former President Trump took in at least $7.8 million from foreign en****** in 20 countries, according to a new report from ********s on the House Oversight Committee, payments to his various businesses that critics say could violate a constitutional prohibition on accepting funding from foreign governments.
The volume of foreign payments during Trump’s presidency is detailed in one of the most exhaustive reviews of Trump’s business dealings with foreign governments while in office.
********s cautioned the total figure is likely larger, and they blasted GOP leadership they’ve accused of releasing Trump’s accounting firm Mazars from turning over requested documents just four months after a years-long legal battle forced it to comply with a congressional subpoena.
“Critically, even this subset of documents reveals a stunning web of millions of dollars in payments made by foreign governments and their agents directly to Trump-owned businesses, while President Trump was in the White House,” ********s wrote in their report.
“By pocketing foreign states’ payments, President Trump repeatedly placed his personal financial interest and the interests of foreign wealth and power above the public interest, resulting in precisely the split loyalty between foreign power and the American people that the Framers sought to avoid.”
The lion’s share of the foreign money — some $5.6 million — flowed from China, which, along with other countries, primarily patronized three properties: Trump hotels in Washington and Las Vegas and Trump Tower in New York.
Concerned the billionaire hotelier’s businesses would be a magnet for foreign spending, ethics experts have long sounded the alarm that Trump’s properties would be a route for violating the emoluments clause of the constitution, which prohibits the president and other government officials from receiving profit or gain because of their role.
The report comes as the GOP is seeking to highlight the extent relatives of President *****, mainly his son Hunter *****, conducted business with foreign governments, including China.
While did conduct millions of dollars of business with Chinese companies and investors, the review of Trump’s business ledgers showed income from Chinese government sources like China’s Embassy in the U.S. and the Chinese state-affiliated Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC).
ICBC spent $5.4 million over nearly three years for a lease at Trump Tower.
The report also covers Trump’s business with other Chinese companies that would not trigger emoluments clause violations but that have otherwise been under scrutiny.
The records show that CEFC, a private Chinese energy company that also did business with Hunter *****, spent more than $5 million on an apartment in Trump World Tower through its subsidiary.
Oversight **********s dismissed the report as part of an “obsession” with Trump.
“Former President Trump has legitimate businesses but the *****s do not. The *****s and their associates made over $24 million by cashing in on the ***** name in China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Romania. No goods or services were provided other than access to Joe ***** and the ***** network,” Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.
However, a Washington Post fact-check found that within that pool of foreign business dealings, just $7.5 million went to ***** family members, with roughly $7 million going directly to Hunter *****.
The fact check also said many of those businesses were not shell companies, as Comer claimed, but were organized around legitimate business activities or investments.
Other countries that patronized Trump’s businesses include Saudi Arabia, with more than $615,000 spent at his properties, and Qatar, which spent more than $460,000.
When Trump was running for office in 2015, he boasted of his good relationship with the Saudis based on his business dealings.
“Saudi Arabia, I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million,” he said at a campaign rally.
“Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much!”
The payments from the Saudi government and its royal family came as the country was working to secure a $100 billion arms deal with the U.S., spending money at Trump properties the month he signed the May 2019 deal.
While the report offers significant insights into Trump’s business activities, it notes shortcomings in documenting the larger picture, writing that what was uncovered was likely a fraction of total spending.
Mazars was either never provided or did not retain key records, the report says, while accusing Comer of releasing the company from providing the records won in a court battle.
House Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) in March pointed to from Trump attorney Patrick Strawbridge saying, “I do not know the status of Mazars production, but my understanding is that the committee has no interest in forcing Mazars to complete it and is willing to release it from further obligations under the settlement agreement.”
Comer denied that at the time.
“There has been no coordination or discussion with anyone from the committee’s majority with anyone about the Mazars documents,” Comer spokesman Jessica Collins said in a statement to The Washington Post, calling the allegations “completely unfounded and untrue.”
The report follows another review earlier this year documenting Trump’s failure to disclose more than .
The Hill has reached out to the Trump campaign for comment.
ProblemChild_JakePaul
Comment