Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle Rittenhouse... NOT GUILTY

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Jc8804 View Post

    Take out the states and and vs laws that protect racism ,this had white privilege written all over it .
    This kid went across state lines with no gun license ,a loaded AR and killed 2 people and wounded a 3rd.

    thats intent, a minor with a loaded weapon and the crime of leaving the scene .

    If this kids name was tyrone smith , he would have been executed on the street . If he somehow made it to court, they would have found a way to give him 20 plus years .
    Not true, he borrowed the gun from a friend that lived in Wisconsin. As far as intent goes, the jury and all reasonable people disagree with you. His intent was to save his life when attacked. Explain the intent of Rosenbaum when he chased Rittenhouse down? Explain the intent of Huber when he wacked Rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard twice? Explain the intent of Lefty when he pointed his pistol at Rittenhouse's head. Explain how this had racism written all over it since everyone involved was white.

    I believe your intent is to act as a race monger.
    1bad65 1bad65 likes this.

    Comment


      Originally posted by travestyny View Post

      This is what it was:



      He also apparently said himself he had no affiliation with ***.
      hmmm.... I'd say you have a good memory.
      travestyny travestyny likes this.

      Comment


        Originally posted by OldTerry View Post

        hmmm.... I'd say you have a good memory.
        Honestly it's just that people say the same things over and over and over again here. Even when you correct it, no one cares because either the false information has gone around so much or they just dismiss the correction because they want to believe what they want to believe.

        These discussions here are pretty worthless. lol. No one ever changes their mind about anything anyway. Sometimes I enjoy the banter. But sometimes I have to remind myself that my time is better spent doing something else. I had been posting less but recently I had a bit more free time.

        Comment


          Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post

          But in every scenario we've spoke of, including the Rittenhouse scenario, the person being assaulted still has the right to defend themselves, right?
          Yeah what is the contradiction? I feel like you are setting me up... No need to do so. What is the issue? I may have missed a response to one of my posts (the new system here lol) so maybe I didn't get something posted?

          Ill make my position crystal clear: There are certain inconsistencies in a life view one has to endure, and others that are a function of ignorance. Example of the first: A person who believes so totally in the right of every individual, the liberties of freedom and support... yet supports ******** because of the right to choose of the women.... probablem/inconsistency being that what about the rights of the fetus?

          Example of the second: Assuming that dealing with violence and weapons effectively is a sign of violence and wanting to engage others in violence...Then you start to study martial arts and begin to understand more and more about the situation... eventually one realizes how ignorant and ****** it is to equate not dealing with violence as eschewing violence...

          I bring this second point up because, there is no way after spending 3/4 of my life dealing with violence, weapons, strategies, etc that I would not be for self defense under all scenarios where it is what it purports to be. Ill go one step further: When it goes too far? many times, tough shiat... Ask for trouble and there is no guarantee it will heap on thou in the specific degree one heaped on others.
          OldTerry OldTerry likes this.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            You can tell the ignorant ppl that try to talk about this case when they mention "crossing state lines"

            That's the media soundbyte that they repeated over and over again.

            1. It's not illegal to "cross state lines"
            2. Kyle never crossed state lines with the gun, the gun was in Kenosha already.
            3. Kyle was never charged with "crossing state lines"

            The only reason morons bring up "crossing state lines" is because that's what they saw or read on the news.
            Im torn on why people bring that up. It does not bother me if a European does so, with some sort of assumption equating states with quasi-countries. A state is, after all, a separate political district of sorts. BUT the Unites States of America has a very distinct system of statehood in the context of FEderal oversite... We are a Republic and the autonomy of each state is the real reason for statehood, not separate political boundaries.

            It just so happens, that to be autonomous and Soveirgn from Federal oppression, states have separate laws. Some of these laws become an issue because there is no way to smooth out the process of enforcing them with different points of view... specifically on alcohol and guns. Thats about the extent of it.

            Comment


              Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

              Im torn on why people bring that up. It does not bother me if a European does so, with some sort of assumption equating states with quasi-countries. A state is, after all, a separate political district of sorts. BUT the Unites States of America has a very distinct system of statehood in the context of FEderal oversite... We are a Republic and the autonomy of each state is the real reason for statehood, not separate political boundaries.

              It just so happens, that to be autonomous and Soveirgn from Federal oppression, states have separate laws. Some of these laws become an issue because there is no way to smooth out the process of enforcing them with different points of view... specifically on alcohol and guns. Thats about the extent of it.
              Supposedly they keep pushing the "crossing state lines" soundbite because there's some state line gun laws in the works.
              billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Biolink View Post


                LETS GOOOOO

                F.uuuuuuccccckkkkkYeeeeeeahhhh! should have been to begin with. YOU LOOT WE SHOOT!

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Straight Up View Post

                  F.uuuuuuccccckkkkkYeeeeeeahhhh! should have been to begin with. YOU LOOT WE SHOOT!
                  Which will obviously lead to....We Loot and Shoot.


                  Fun times for all!
                  OldTerry OldTerry billeau2 billeau2 like this.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

                    Im torn on why people bring that up. It does not bother me if a European does so, with some sort of assumption equating states with quasi-countries. A state is, after all, a separate political district of sorts. BUT the Unites States of America has a very distinct system of statehood in the context of FEderal oversite... We are a Republic and the autonomy of each state is the real reason for statehood, not separate political boundaries.

                    It just so happens, that to be autonomous and Soveirgn from Federal oppression, states have separate laws. Some of these laws become an issue because there is no way to smooth out the process of enforcing them with different points of view... specifically on alcohol and guns. Thats about the extent of it.
                    It’s because they are sheep and the media told them what to think. I rolled my eyes the first time I heard it. I don’t care if he flew across country. It’s irrelevant.



                    Last edited by Stan Love; 11-20-2021, 08:03 PM.
                    OldTerry OldTerry billeau2 billeau2 like this.

                    Comment


                      I think you guys are looking way too much into it. I think "crossed state lines" really is just another way of saying he should have stayed his ass at home.
                      billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP