@motherducker
I spoke to my friend at training, not football btw, athletics, we spoke about england, i was like, this dude online is trying to tell me the old gen is better then the new gen, this is his, i didnt put words in his mouth.
'No way, the academies have focused on technique and skill the players coming through are a lot more skillful'
which obviously i agreed, he also said..
'the old gen, if they were around now, 18,19, they wouldnt come through!' haha, pretty bolt statement. i thought it was a good point though, some of them likely wouldnt come through.
the game has evolved, ask professional footballers, you could ask the old gen themself, they spoke about it on football focus, its evolved, the players now have a better alround game, not just good on the ball much more to the game then that.
sparked, ruben loftus cheek, youre a chelsea fan, is he the future? My friend said mouriniho said he cant risk him cause chelsea have a prem title to win, but apparently his better then ramirez and mikel at CM. Ive heard of him, apparently pre season he bullied yaya toure lol. English btw
dont think you no your football to even have heard of him
6'4, fast, good on the ball, apparently the future, just not being played cause of foreiners, which could be the only hold back for england, these new players actually playing in the PL cause of foreigners.
if you think old gen is better, fair enough, im currently watching football focus, they basically said, the new gen is better.
im not going to argue with it now ive heard from ex footballers on football focus, they said new gen is better.
if you think they are better, ill respect that, but i disagree, the new gen would have to fail to qualify for 2016 (8 years after failing to croatia) to be like the old gen, id say Ukraine are as good at old croatia. Going life and death with the likes of greece etc, yes for beckham, yes for england.
better athletes, not sure youve done A level sport, but its about fitness componants, the footballers now are as good on the ball, but better fitness attributes. Therefore, better athletic ability, whilst having similar or even better skill and technique on the ball as the acdemies are putting millions into it, from 95 to 05, there was a lot more english players to choose from, which could be englands downfall as there more foreigners now.
i wouldnt be suprised if you thought Gary Neville was better alround player then Nathiel Clyne just cause his united and his won trophies.
Anyway, as the football experts have agreed with me on football focus, ill just agree to disagree, and see what happens in the Euro's.
I spoke to my friend at training, not football btw, athletics, we spoke about england, i was like, this dude online is trying to tell me the old gen is better then the new gen, this is his, i didnt put words in his mouth.
'No way, the academies have focused on technique and skill the players coming through are a lot more skillful'
which obviously i agreed, he also said..
'the old gen, if they were around now, 18,19, they wouldnt come through!' haha, pretty bolt statement. i thought it was a good point though, some of them likely wouldnt come through.
the game has evolved, ask professional footballers, you could ask the old gen themself, they spoke about it on football focus, its evolved, the players now have a better alround game, not just good on the ball much more to the game then that.
sparked, ruben loftus cheek, youre a chelsea fan, is he the future? My friend said mouriniho said he cant risk him cause chelsea have a prem title to win, but apparently his better then ramirez and mikel at CM. Ive heard of him, apparently pre season he bullied yaya toure lol. English btw
dont think you no your football to even have heard of him
6'4, fast, good on the ball, apparently the future, just not being played cause of foreiners, which could be the only hold back for england, these new players actually playing in the PL cause of foreigners.
if you think old gen is better, fair enough, im currently watching football focus, they basically said, the new gen is better.
im not going to argue with it now ive heard from ex footballers on football focus, they said new gen is better.
if you think they are better, ill respect that, but i disagree, the new gen would have to fail to qualify for 2016 (8 years after failing to croatia) to be like the old gen, id say Ukraine are as good at old croatia. Going life and death with the likes of greece etc, yes for beckham, yes for england.
better athletes, not sure youve done A level sport, but its about fitness componants, the footballers now are as good on the ball, but better fitness attributes. Therefore, better athletic ability, whilst having similar or even better skill and technique on the ball as the acdemies are putting millions into it, from 95 to 05, there was a lot more english players to choose from, which could be englands downfall as there more foreigners now.
i wouldnt be suprised if you thought Gary Neville was better alround player then Nathiel Clyne just cause his united and his won trophies.
Anyway, as the football experts have agreed with me on football focus, ill just agree to disagree, and see what happens in the Euro's.
Comment