Originally posted by BangEM
View Post
Pulev: European Championships gold and bronze, EU Championships gold and silver, Worlds bronze. Competed at one Olympics, no medals. Amateur record of a little over 100 wins with 3 losses.
Usyk: European Championships gold and bronze, Worlds gold and bronze. Never competed at the EUs and competed at two Olympics, medalled at one. Amateur record of over 300 wins with 15 losses.
Usyk has the better amateur pedigree.
His IQ includes his footwork which is probably only rivalled by Fury (footwork is a surefire indicator of a high boxing IQ, and Pulev's looks like an ogre in comparison), manoeuvring his opponents with said footwork and setting up his angles. His punch anticipation is also much better than Pulev's, and with his accuracy, his counter punching is much better. I don't think it's even a competition as to who's more skilled. I'm not saying Pulev isn't skilled, just that Usyk is much more so.
The only problem I see with Usyk is his slow starts and his tendency to enjoy standing in front of an opponent and taking their punches.
People can say he ran from Povetkin, but when you take into account that his main goal since turning heavyweight has been to fight AJ, it kind of sounds silly. Why avoid a wily old wolf to go for a powerful young lion? Doesn't make much sense.
Comment