Floyd's Illegal IV; A Prefight Ritual Or A One-Time Thing?

[N/A]

and you can't see thats part of the grift? i'm going to notify usada that im cheating and they are going to let me.

IV was legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason. Floyd and Manny chose to hire USADA to analyze any IV use to make sure it was for legitimate medical reasons. They determined it was. There's really no controversy here other than what you've invented in your head. Under the rules of Nevada, IV use wasn't cheating. It was completely legal.

[NORMNEALON]

Tues can be granted retroactively, but they cant be applied for retroactively . They are to be applied for before the contest is complete. Or after a dirty pre fight test . Not 3 weeks after the fight . Anyways ,night iam out .over . Again show me another example of someone who applied for a tues 3 weeks after their fight , 3 weeks after the tue was administered . Til then we are done

[b00g13man]

So the USADA doc who administered it at Floyd's house ( also illegal ) put a bag on Floyd's head?? He knew who the **** floyd was and the panel did too after they are reviewing a viral case for IV which was all over everywhere hence why floyd and USADA had to apply for the Tue in the first place .

The IV was administered by a paramedic. Nothing to do with USADA. The paramedic made the call that the IV was necessary. All the USADA DCO did was ensure that a sample was taken before and after. It's then up to the athlete to submit the paperwork for the restrospective TUE, which then gets reviewed anonymously.

[Articulateboxin]

It really wasn't shady at all. But for fans who don't know how these things usually work, Hauser, hired to write a hit piece, publicly known to be on HBO's payroll to smear their enemies, was able to fool people into thinking something shady had taken place.

I've read through most of this thread and as a genuine neutral, there are a few sticking points that I find quite curious.

Floyd never had any history of struggling to make welter, infact i'm pretty sure he fought his next fight at welter too. If his dehydration situation was so critical as to need 15 times the stated non TUE exemption limit, why on earth wouldn't he move up in weight? (Infact after checking, he weighed in exactly 146 for both manny and berto.)

The second curious point is to the 150k payment, instead of the standard 15k.

There are 2 huge exceptions here in what is coincidentally the biggest fight of his entire career. It may well be coincidence but there seems to be a fine line between unusual and shady here.

I'm a huge fan of both fighters btw and have no bias towards either. The same probably cannot be side for a lot of people defending either side of the case here

[N/A]

The wada rules which USADA is supposed to adhere by is tues will only be granted if it is a matter of life and death

The word death does not appear in that document whatsoever.

[NORMNEALON]

IV was legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason. Floyd and Manny chose to hire USADA to analyze any IV use to make sure it was for legitimate medical reasons. They determined it was. There's really no controversy here other than what you've invented in your head. Under the rules of Nevada, IV use wasn't cheating. It was completely legal.

No it was not . It was legal under 50ml per 6 hours for the 18th time. The tue made it okay ,but it was applied for 3 weeks after the fight and the IV was the day before not reporting that to the athletic commission is shady . Any way u wanna a put it . Them having to soepena usada for information they are entitled to as per the WADA rules and regulations that USADA is supposed to follow and that isnt shady ..hmmmmmmmmmm

[NORMNEALON]

The IV was administered by a paramedic. Nothing to do with USADA. The paramedic made the call that the IV was necessary. All the USADA DCO did was ensure that a sample was taken before and after. It's then up to the athlete to submit the paperwork for the restrospective TUE, which then gets reviewed anonymously.

Yet the dco arrived after the iv was being administered. How did he test the fighter before the iv if that's the case ?? As per WADA rules( which nsac has USADA follow ) . That's not shady ?? The whole thing is shady . That's all iam saying

[NORMNEALON]

I've read through most of this thread and as a genuine neutral, there are a few sticking points that I find quite curious.

Floyd never had any history of struggling to make welter, infact i'm pretty sure he fought his next fight at welter too. If his dehydration situation was so critical as to need 15 times the stated non TUE exemption limit, why on earth wouldn't he move up in weight? (Infact after checking, he weighed in exactly 146 for both manny and berto.)

The second curious point is to the 150k payment, instead of the standard 15k.

There are 2 huge exceptions here in what is coincidentally the biggest fight of his entire career. It may well be coincidence but there seems to be a fine line between unusual and shady here.

I'm a huge fan of both fighters btw and have no bias towards either. The same probably cannot be side for a lot of people defending either side of the case here

Good post my man thanks for your insight , and I agree whole heartingly.


There is some shady stuff going on is all I've been saying and I think that's more than fair

[BoomBapTrap]

Pacquiao threatened to make his bastard son disappear. Who the **** threatens their child like that?

WHO BEATS THEIR BABY MAMA IN FRONT KF THEIR CHILDREN?

And has their security there to make sure they don’t get hit back by their baby mama?

Do you do that?
Do you BEAT THE MOTHER OF YOUR CHILDREN? In front of your children? And have security on stand by like a coward?

[NORMNEALON]

"The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did."


There some quotes from the commission in vegas . And I will find the life and death claim and post it here too . After that iam done with the thread and u can move on son .