Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Unlikely To Box Until Being Cleared, Says Hearn

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    He was cleared to fight doe

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
      ... still curious: just why VADA doesn't say anything about this???
      Why would VADA comment on a case they had nothing to do with? They don't have the findings. He didn't fail their test.

      Comment


        #23
        This is a no sh/t type of headline/statement, A Whyte is a dirty disgrace to boxing, and his silence is deafening right now, esp for such a loud mouth.

        He is STONE guilty, kick this POS out of boxing for 2 years or so

        Comment


          #24
          Lol this guy is always talking about other boxers using and look at him.he just don't have that kinda Vlad money or Joshua money to buy a good chemist and beat PED test

          Comment


            #25
            "It is not even known whether Whyte has requested the B sample from his June 17 test to be checked."

            How can he be cleared without B sample testing results? Those results should be released by now, and if it wasn't even tested, then that's even worse!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
              ... still curious: just why VADA doesn't say anything about this???
              You would think some journalist from the boxing world would have called and asked VADA "How is that UKAD found these metabolites, and you did not?" They should have made a statement at the minimum!

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by tokon View Post
                UKAD wouldn't waste time and money organising a hearing without the result of B sample.
                I understand UKAD need to "respect the individuals right to confidentiality" but there's nothing preventing Whyte, or his promoter, clarifying if the B sample has been tested, and what the result is? Or, if it hasn't, why not?

                This entire episode, and the way it's been handled by BBBC, UKAD and Hearns absolutely stinks.
                These days, people get caught with their hand in the cookie jar and just shake it off. They wait a while for the heat to die down, then throw a sacrifice to the wolves. UKAD, the BBBofBS, and Hearn allegedly conspired to hide the results from Rivas. Now they want to make an example out of Whyte?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                  You would think some journalist from the boxing world would have called and asked VADA "How is that UKAD found these metabolites, and you did not?" They should have made a statement at the minimum!
                  What you want to bet that they use that as an "OUT".

                  Hearn: "It must have been a contamination, because VADA didn't pick up the same metabolites."

                  All this episode does is call into question VADA testing, or lack thereof. And the complete corrupt nature of boxing on a whole.:3some:

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by arraamis View Post
                    What you want to bet that they use that as an "OUT".

                    Hearn: "It must have been a contamination, because VADA didn't pick up the same metabolites."

                    All this episode does is call into question VADA testing, or lack thereof. And the complete corrupt nature of boxing on a whole.:3some:
                    FACTS! Salute to J-Rock! I think he's closer to a solution! I think the next step is for each fighter to have the rights to know WHEN their opponent had been tested (of course not in advance), and WHAT the results of the tests are, and WHO performed the test! There will always be cheaters, and corruption, but that extra step, added to a 90-day testing period would probably help even the playing field, or expose the corruption!

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
                      ... still curious: just why VADA doesn't say anything about this???
                      VADA cleared both men to fight, that's all they needed to say. And like everybody else involved, they are not legally allowed to say anything in public about an ongoing UKAD case.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP