Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

casual fans need to learn how to score a fight.....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
    It looks judges are following a policy that a fighter who gets knocked down automatically loses the round, and gets a point deducted for the KD.
    Yeah, it seems so.

    Comment


      Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
      lol true. I forgot about that rare species, the black Brit. Lennox, AJ, Dillian Whyte, Eubank, Brook, even probably Frank Bruno, all automatically rubbish, and not really "black"

      good call.. LOL
      Lennox is ok, because he works for PBC. The others are Eurobum coons.


      .

      Comment


        Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
        Ello mate ;0 - Honestly my friend I was just trying to inform you of how judges score fights...it happens to line up with my worldview as well, and I personally am surprised that some boxing fans are scoring anything other than landed punches and their effectiveness.

        The other stuff certainly matters, as Weisfeld below points out...but it is not actively scored...those things just help a fighter get in his position to score points, by landing punches:

        "A lot of times fans hear that judges focus on four categories: clean punches, effective aggressiveness, defense and ring generalship," Weisfeld said. "But based upon my own experience, my conversations with other judges and seminars conducted by top judges, judges really focus on one category, and that's clean punches.

        Clean punches: To me, clean punches are the most important aspect, and the other factors are really tied to that. Take the phrase, "effective aggressiveness." How is a boxer effective? He's effective by landing clean punches. How about "defense?" A boxer shows great defense by not getting hit with clean punches. And, finally, the term "ring generalship." A boxer uses the ring to put himself in a position to land clean punches."

        I've posted that for you a number of times, not sure why you are keeping with the same arguments my friend.

        Lol this...100 times sir...main problem in boxing scoring is corrupt judging...95% of fights have 1 clear winner...for anyone to suggest otherwise, I mean I don't get it...



        Steve Weisfeld says.....


        [IMG]//media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]



        Comment


          Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
          Well you fell for it. I knew if I waited long enough I'd catch a sucker. So for all your BS about Compubox you looked that up long ago because you have been carping about the punch output for quite a while.


          wait, so..... that was a trap..... ?

          you, pretending to be a typical boxrec-using casual-fan moron for YEARS..... was just a trap to lure me in..... ?

          and.....

          Golovkin did not miss 1000+ PUNCHES (LMAO), because..... boxrec is inaccurate, as it does not use the official criteria to judge a scoring punch..... ?

          is... that... what... you... are... saying... Tony... Baloney... ?




          Comment


            Boxing1013, kafkod, and TonyGE.....

            attempting to remove 3 of the 4 official scoring criteria..... was not your best work guys LMAO

            even most dumbass casual-fans are like..... wtf ?

            truly truly hilarious


            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP