Originally posted by vitali1999
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua Throws Water at Tyson Fury's Lineal Champion Claim
Collapse
-
Originally posted by allen23 View Postcome on man u cant consider him unified until he fights wilder or/and fury. he never beat a champion to win them titles ( and dont refer to wlad who spent two years out of the ring after a defeat and was in his 40's).
hes just salty as wilder and fury have grabbed his limelight and hes went from being the guy everyone wanted a piece of to the guy who needs to prove himself after the fight in LA. serves him right for thinking the game was in his hands without having to fight the best, u cant cheat the public
Its also a FACT, Charles Martin and Joseph Parker were World Champions, regardless of how they won the belt, regardless of how poor they faired against Joshua, its a FACT, they are former WORLD CHAMPIONS. Opinion is always *****ed by fact, sorry to say.
If it goes down the route of a Wilder v Fury trilogy, who is the winner of that going to fight next? Mandatories until they retire? Not a chance. Joshua is the prize. You can deny it over and over, Joshua is the Unified World Heavyweight Champion and Fury/Wilder still want Joshua.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View PostUnification *****s mandatory.
I would genuinely like to see the individual policies on mandatories v unification. I would assume that each organisation has a different policy.
It does seem that the WBC doesn't really hold their mandatory fighter in high regard but the IBF do push mandatory fights quite quickly.
Who knows what the hell is going on in the WBA, WBO or IBO!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeGoodland View PostWilder and Ortiz are better than Klitschko!? Don't make me laugh.
Whyte would beat Ortiz and probably Wilder.
Breazeale would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Povetkin would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Parker would probably beat Ortiz. Doubt it against Wilder though.
Fury has is a great win against Klitschko, a decent recovery win against Cunningham, a boring retirement rematch v Chisora and now a robbery draw against Wilder.
Fury is great HW boxer and will probably fight top fighters in the next few years but don't make yourself look silly.
You have won the prize for most stup1dest comment on the internet. Cong****
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jkp View PostMy favorite part of your comment was when you said whyte beats ortiz and wilder.
You have won the prize for most stup1dest comment on the internet. Cong****
How pathetic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeGoodland View PostI agree with both of you, in a way.
I would genuinely like to see the individual policies on mandatories v unification. I would assume that each organisation has a different policy.
It does seem that the WBC doesn't really hold their mandatory fighter in high regard but the IBF do push mandatory fights quite quickly.
Who knows what the hell is going on in the WBA, WBO or IBO!
“If Wilder wants to fight Fury, he'll fight Fury. If he wants to be undisputed, he'll fight Joshua. It [unification] can ***** anything. I don't know how much that means to Wilder. It means everything to us, means everything to Joshua” - Eddie Hearn.
Seems like a double standard, no?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeGoodland View PostWilder and Ortiz are better than Klitschko!? Don't make me laugh.
Whyte would beat Ortiz and probably Wilder.
Breazeale would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Povetkin would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Parker would probably beat Ortiz. Doubt it against Wilder though.
Fury has is a great win against Klitschko, a decent recovery win against Cunningham, a boring retirement rematch v Chisora and now a robbery draw against Wilder.
Fury is great HW boxer and will probably fight top fighters in the next few years but don't make yourself look silly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by allen23 View Postlad breazeale, parker and whyte are all limited boxers compared to ortiz, do u buy into everything that comes out of eddie hearn and sky sports? uk heavyweight fans just dont appreciate boxers outside the uk ortiz even in his 40's would smash those guys
Breazeale and Parker have nothing to do with Matchroom, Eddie Hearn or Sky. The only connection is that they have all fought and lost against Anthony Joshua. So, no, I don't believe everything they say, does that answer your condescending question adequately? I would pick Hearn's word over that of Finkel or Warren, any day of the week though. That's my own personal preference.
I appreciate a lot of boxers outside of the UK. Hence why I mentioned Breazeale. Unfortunately, 3 of the top 4 TBRB rated HW's are 'English' so do you blame UK fans for not rating other fighters outside of the UK?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeGoodland View PostWilder and Ortiz are better than Klitschko!? Don't make me laugh.
Whyte would beat Ortiz and probably Wilder.
Breazeale would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Povetkin would probably beat Ortiz and possibly Wilder.
Parker would probably beat Ortiz. Doubt it against Wilder though.
Fury has is a great win against Klitschko, a decent recovery win against Cunningham, a boring retirement rematch v Chisora and now a robbery draw against Wilder.
Fury is great HW boxer and will probably fight top fighters in the next few years but don't make yourself look silly.
Comment
Comment