i like that spence is hyping up this potential fight, but his resume is pretty weak imo. them cats he named are old or weak. downplaying what TC did at '40 is ignorant and for Bud to fight a beltholder in his 1st fight at '47 is pretty good. Spence still aint fought a NAME guy at '47.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Spence: I'm Way Better Fighter Than Crawford; Who Has He Fought?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Overunder View PostBud is going to surgically dispatch Spence. I cannot give Spence props for fighting a guy who is a 135 title holder next. That weak sauce. A battered and beaten Kell Brook jumping down to fight Spence holds little merit with me as well. We are comparing resumes to a 3 division champion who has unified in a weight class and beat 2 undfeated gold medalist. No one since Gamboa has remotely challenged his reign and even Gamboa kissed the canvas 4 times.
I will admit Spence had no business talking about his resume. However I will though. Ricky Burns is garbage. Seen all his fights, absolute Dog poop . Indongo who is fresh horse manure actually beat Burns which isn’t a real feat. Nevertheless Crawford dispatched of Indongo which was impressive but then Prograis beat Indongo even more impressively. So what am I to think Prograis is better than Crawford?.... Nope Indongo is just straight warm gooey Horse s#hit. Postal was an impressive win though but Gamboa was too small and the fact that he hurt Crawford tells me all I need to know the way Spence will make him scream if he gets his hands on him.Last edited by Noelanthony; 09-10-2018, 12:17 PM.
Comment
-
-
everyone knows the division between promoters and networks and it's true that it makes for some fights difficult to make but for a fighter to emphasize that as a hindrance to not fight another fighter is a b!tch move. just say you're ready for that fight if you're really up to it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mrlopez View Posti like that spence is hyping up this potential fight, but his resume is pretty weak imo. them cats he named are old or weak. downplaying what TC did at '40 is ignorant and for Bud to fight a beltholder in his 1st fight at '47 is pretty good. Spence still aint fought a NAME guy at '47.
Crawford is already P4P no 1. He has been given his accolades and been rewarded for his skill. He definitely ain’t no 1 for the opponents he has fought.
Crawford is in a new division now and he has to earn his strips. He has again been rewarded with a soft title at his new division but he has to now show me he has dog in him. Errol has
Comment
-
Originally posted by LetOutTheCage View PostOk who has Spence fought since Brook? Spence is far more hyped than Crawford, all I read on here is how Spence is avoided by everybody and would crush all the welterweights without fighting any of them...
I already said it wasn't an excuse. I mentioned in a previous post that even if Brook didn't have the weight cut issue and hadn't lost to GGG he still would have likely lost to Spence. My point is that he likely wouldn't be as dominant in that fight. If you dispute that as an excuse then there really isn't anything else to say.
I haven't asked anything other than that.
Comment
-
Styles make fights and they both box very well. What i wanna see is who will be more accurate and land more punches that catch the judges eyes.. Will crawford be able to catch and throw punches all nite like he usually does.. Does Spence catch him clean. Crawford wont go on the first body shot or will he be able to catch crawford... Will crawford ego show UP an eventually go toe to toe with spence. So many questions i want answers.. Please make this fight..
Comment
Comment