Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

>>> LOSING to Orlando Salido excludes you from P4P #1 status when...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
    So, are you arguing that Lomachenko is better than Leonard, Hearns, Hagler, Duran, and RJJ?
    No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic.

    Lol at Sven Ottis being better than SRR. Your INSANE.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
      Calzaghe > Roy Jones?

      He kicked his ass and was unbeaten.

      Calzaghe > Hopkins?
      Are you arguing that Calzaghe is better than Jones and Hopkins?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
        No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic..
        Sorry but NO.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
          Are you arguing that Calzaghe is better than Jones and Hopkins?
          Dude, Calzaghe is undefeated.

          YOUR rules. Live by them.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
            No. YOU are. I'm applying YOUR logic.

            Lol at Sven Ottis being better than SRR. Your INSANE.
            That wasn't his point. Seems you know this but are pretending it is because you don't agree with his opinion.

            Comment


              #26
              So nobody with a loss on their record can ever be P4P # 1? I was not aware of that rule.

              P4P lists are subjective mostly and I really don't care where Loma is ranked. But thread starter's anus is so sore he can't even fart without crying.

              Comment


                #27
                Being undefeated is overrated, it looks nice but can be hollow. Who you beat is more important than who you lose to imo. With that being said, I've always hated the idea of P4P rankings and trying to compare guys achievements across different weight classes. Just think it's dumb extrapolations of unrealistic nonsense, just compare guys who fight at the same or near weight classes. Who gives a **** whether somebody thinks Sor Rungvisai's resume is superior to Oleksandr Usyk's? What the **** does it matter??

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Derranged View Post
                  So nobody with a loss on their record can ever be P4P # 1? I was not aware of that rule.

                  P4P lists are subjective mostly and I really don't care where Loma is ranked. But thread starter's anus is so sore he can't even fart without crying.
                  People take p4p too seriously and create their own rules.

                  Pound for pound for a lot of people it's mainly who their favorite is or who they want it to be and change their rules accordingly.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                    Another nuthugger who thinks a win over Linares caliber fighters warrants P4P #1 status.

                    YDKSAB...
                    Again, I think P4P **** is one of the dumbest things about boxing, but with that being said, Linares is of higher quality than anybody Crawford has beaten

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Almost everybody who knows boxing has Lomachenko p4p #1 right now. Get over it salty *****

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP