Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: Jermell Charlo is Not a Top Dog or a Lion at 154 - I Am!

[TheBigLug]

Brook is a masochist that ****s men for sport. He would absolutely fight Charlo no doubt about that. Would Charlo go to England? Even with a belt Charlo doesn't bring in the money and could use a name like Brook on the resume.

I know Brook would fight anyone but i think Hearn will try to get him and play it safe by enticing him with the Khan fight.

That Khan fight still makes BIG money.

[Elroy The Great]

So you’re saying dopings basically OK and everyone should be allowed to do it, just to justify your beloved Roy testing positive.

Peds give you better stamina and enable you to hit harder, which damages your opponent. It doesn’t guarantee a win, that’s not the point, it enables you to inflict more damage on an opponent than if you weren’t on them.
It’s cheating.

Whatever man, think what you want anyway, I’m not wasting my time on you.

all sports should regulate it since it doesnt hurt anyone (except the user IF they over do it).

bottom line, theres no scientific proof that a roider won a fight he had no business winning. just a bunch of

[LacedUp]

Even Jim Watt scored it to Porter, it was a very close fight that could’ve went either way are you dis*****g that?

And even if you did score it to Brook which is more than fair, he did not look impressive in that fight, as opposed to Charlo who looked sensational against Lubin.

And as my original statement read, “it’s besides the point”, because what is so ridiculous about what Brook is saying is; the fact he’s absurdly claiming he’s “top dog at 154” when his only win at 154 is Rabchenko🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s pathetic just like anyone who defends this quitter.

Jim Watt Possibly the worst scorer of fights of all times.

Yes I'm dis*****g that. Porter didn't land a clean blow all night.

'quitter'. Shaking my head. Go to bed kid.

[apollocreed]

all sports should regulate it since it doesnt hurt anyone (except the user IF they over do it).

bottom line, theres no scientific proof that a roider won a fight he had no business winning. just a bunch of

I already made this point, and you failed to comprehend it, but I'll try one more time:

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF IT GUARANTEES YOU WINNING OR NOT - IT IMPROVES PERFORMANCE (HENCE WHY THEY ARE CALLED 'PERFORMANCE ENHANCING'), BY ENABLING YOU TO FIGHT WITH BETTER ENDURANCE AND TO HIT HARDER. YOU ARE HITTING AN OPPONENT WITH ENHANCED POWER - THIS IS WHY IT IS DIRTY CHEATNG. IT'S NO DIFFERENT TO HAVING LOADED GLOVES LIKE MARGARITO.
YOU'RE INFLICTING EXTRA DAMAGE ON AN OPPONENT BY HAVING ENHANCED STRENGTH. THIS COULD EASILY LEAD TO MORE SERIOUS INJURIES, BOTH IN THE SHORT TERM, AND IN LATER LIFE, LIKE CTE.

If you still can't understand that, you are one seriously dumb MF.

[AliBombaye]

This *******ual mullato is starting to sound as delusional as Khan as each day passes.

[Elroy The Great]

I already made this point, and you failed to comprehend it, but I'll try one more time:

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF IT GUARANTEES YOU WINNING OR NOT - IT IMPROVES PERFORMANCE (HENCE WHY THEY ARE CALLED 'PERFORMANCE ENHANCING'), BY ENABLING YOU TO FIGHT WITH BETTER ENDURANCE AND TO HIT HARDER. YOU ARE HITTING AN OPPONENT WITH ENHANCED POWER - THIS IS WHY IT IS DIRTY CHEATNG. IT'S NO DIFFERENT TO HAVING LOADED GLOVES LIKE MARGARITO.
YOU'RE INFLICTING EXTRA DAMAGE ON AN OPPONENT BY HAVING ENHANCED STRENGTH. THIS COULD EASILY LEAD TO MORE SERIOUS INJURIES, BOTH IN THE SHORT TERM, AND IN LATER LIFE, LIKE CTE.

If you still can't understand that, you are one seriously dumb MF.

capping wont replace scientific proof (or lack thereof). show me a fight where the roider won a fight he had no business of winning.

it shouldnt be hard.

[M Bison]

Jermell Charlo needs to stop ducking Kell Brook, this fight needs to happen in England because let's be honest...
Charlo has a very weak following, he isn't PPV material, and If he wants money which he quite obviously does hence why he has ducked Lara like the plague.
So If he wants that payday he quite obviously is begging for he will travel to England and Kell will make him famous, Kell will school him no problem at all.

[apollocreed]

capping wont replace scientific proof (or lack thereof). show me a fight where the roider won a fight he had no business of winning.

it shouldnt be hard.

Wow you are one cretinous MF - for the final time, it's not about guaranteeing winning! It's about inflicting more damage on an opponent than you would if you weren't doping! Doping doesn't guarantee a win, that's not the point.
How can you still not understand that?

It's like wearing loaded gloves, it's an unfair advantage which enables you to inflict more damage on an opponent. That is why it is ethically wrong. Or maybe you think loaded gloves is OK too.

I'm not bothering replying again if you still can't understand that. Life's too short for this ****.

Congratulations, you're up there with the dumbest people I've encountered on this site.

[Elroy The Great]

Wow you are one cretinous MF - for the final time, it's not about guaranteeing winning! It's about inflicting more damage on an opponent than you would if you weren't doping!

an even stronger point for my side......



''List of deaths due to injuries sustained in boxing''

which roider killed which guy ?

[Elroy The Great]

''roids, doe !!! ggggrrrrrrrrr.............''