Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: Jermell Charlo is Not a Top Dog or a Lion at 154 - I Am!

[isagj]

this dude's been hanging around Amir Khan and Fast Eddie too long already. He's already making excuses to duck Charlo. "He doesn't have a name", but then he says he wants to fight Hurd who has a smaller name than Charlo. FOH. Brits are looking real clownish these days.

[LacedUp]

Charlo destroying Lubin is way more impressive than Brook getting a razor thin arguably a gift decision vs Porter, but that’s besides the point. I digress.

Brook is absurdly claiming he is already top dog at 154, that is frankly BS cause the only win he has on his resume at 154 is Sergey Rabchenko a guy who’s European level. He’s a deluded idiot, whose eaten one to many crayons

Lol Lubin.. you’re kidding I hope

I don’t think that’s actually what he’s trying to say. He’s saying he’s the best - not he’s the champ so to speak.

[Elroy The Great]

Jones tested positive in 2000 after his fight with Richard Hall.
I’m guessing this is a genuine question, it’s hard to tell if you’re being sarcastic.
He blamed it on a supplement called Ripped Fuel.
The question which no one actually knows the answer to for sure, is was it a genuine one time mistake, or did he dope for other fights in his career and just not get caught.
Testing was very lax back then.
Look at Moseley - he never got caught, it just came out because the Balco lab got busted.

oh, **** hall. of course. who wouldnt need roids/p'e'ds when facing **** hall ? give rjj credit for stepping up to the challenge.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Lol Lubin.. you’re kidding I hope

I don’t think that’s actually what he’s trying to say. He’s saying he’s the best - not he’s the champ so to speak.

It was a much more impressive performance, not a better opponent. And I actually scored Porter-Brook a close win for Porter. Even in getting the W Brook didn’t look impressive at all in that fight. Whilst Charlo annihilated a top rated contender who A LOT of people where picking to beat him. There’s no doubt that was a better performance.

How can Brook claim he’s the best fighter at 154😭😭 when his only win at the weight is Rabchenko🤣🤣🤣 it’s ridiculous.

[LacedUp]

It was a much more impressive performance, not a better opponent. And I actually scored Porter-Brook a close win for Porter. Even in getting the W Brook didn’t look impressive at all in that fight. Whilst Charlo annihilated a top rated contender who A LOT of people where picking to beat him. There’s no doubt that was a better performance.

How can Brook claim he’s the best fighter at 154😭😭 when his only win at the weight is Rabchenko🤣🤣🤣 it’s ridiculous.

It’s not my fault or anyone else that you suck balls at scoring fights.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

It’s not my fault or anyone else that you suck balls at scoring fights.

Even Jim Watt scored it to Porter, it was a very close fight that could’ve went either way are you dis*****g that?

And even if you did score it to Brook which is more than fair, he did not look impressive in that fight, as opposed to Charlo who looked sensational against Lubin.

And as my original statement read, “it’s besides the point”, because what is so ridiculous about what Brook is saying is; the fact he’s absurdly claiming he’s “top dog at 154” when his only win at 154 is Rabchenko🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s pathetic just like anyone who defends this quitter.

[apollocreed]

oh, **** hall. of course. who wouldnt need roids/p'e'ds when facing **** hall ? give rjj credit for stepping up to the challenge.

Like I already said, which you would have spotted if you actually bothered to read and comprehend my post properly:

The question which no one actually knows the answer to for sure, is was it a genuine one time mistake, or did he dope for other fights in his career and just not get caught.
Testing was very lax back then.
Look at Moseley - he never got caught, it just came out because the Balco lab got busted.

[Elroy The Great]

Like I already said, which you would have spotted if you actually bothered to read and comprehend my post properly:

The question which no one actually knows the answer to for sure, is was it a genuine one time mistake, or did he dope for other fights in his career and just not get caught.
Testing was very lax back then.
Look at Moseley - he never got caught, it just came out because the Balco lab got busted.

so when so called fight fans say roid jones jr, theyre just expressing their love for the sport.

seriously, when will the stigma of roids/p'e'ds cease ?!?!?
the shlt doesnt give a guy wins. never have never will.

even evan holyfield lost fights.

[apollocreed]

so when so called fight fans say roid jones jr, theyre just expressing their love for the sport.

seriously, when will the stigma of roids/p'e'ds cease ?!?!?
the shlt doesnt give a guy wins. never have never will.

even evan holyfield lost fights.

So you’re saying dopings basically OK and everyone should be allowed to do it, just to justify your beloved Roy testing positive.

Peds give you better stamina and enable you to hit harder, which damages your opponent. It doesn’t guarantee a win, that’s not the point, it enables you to inflict more damage on an opponent than if you weren’t on them.
It’s cheating.

Whatever man, think what you want anyway, I’m not wasting my time on you.

[Boxing lives]

Make the fight then, i'm sure it could me made.

I like Brook but there's no way he takes a tough fight until it's certain a fight with Khan is or isn't happening. Until then, Brook under Hearn's advice will fight another beatable opponent, as will Khan and then try to make the Khan v Brook fight. That's their end game here. Another loss will probably kill off that fight. If they both beat a few soft touches, it's still a big fight.

I do believe Brook would fight anyone but Hearn will be in his ear to play it safe until it's clear either way what's happening with a Khan fight.

Brook is a masochist that ****s men for sport. He would absolutely fight Charlo no doubt about that. Would Charlo go to England? Even with a belt Charlo doesn't bring in the money and could use a name like Brook on the resume.