I like how Saunders is basically saying he wouldn't stand a chance against a prime GGG... Props for the honesty dude...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Saunders: Golovkin is 35 Now, Can't Keep Up To Outbox Me
Collapse
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostYou dsab your the ****** fįggot that hates certain fighters to the point of blind ******ation. Nobody was following anything your bītch ass said,I hapoened to come across u doing what u do best being a dsab trying to blatantly LIE about gbp supposedly putting tiny ringsize in their fighters contract (who u hate)& use it to supposedly prove what a bītch canelo is. Funny thing too,as floyd is the one who used to put huge ringsize in contract,the same floyd u :*******: 24/7. You respond with"a novel" while claiming I wrote "a novel u wont read"
Comment
-
"you know everyone now is 'Billy Joe is this, Billy Joe is the next big thing, he's going to beat Golovkin, he can beat Canelo,'" Saunders said."
Hmmm... who is everyone?
I watched the extensive commentary on Box Nation. Brits like himself. Nobody, I mean NO ONE even implied that at all. Way less the Americans. What I have heard people say, specially the Britons, is that NOW with his great display of skill vs. a pathetic Lemieux, he is AT BOTH GGG and Canelo's level, that is that now he can be considered an A-fighter who can actually be competitive against any of the two guys. But I never ever heard anyone that he is GOING TO beat any of them, no way! Just that it would be competitive, intriguing contests, PROVIDED THAT he comes to fight any of them, with the same great conditioning, attitude and intelligent fighting plan throughout the whole fight. And AFAIK, the fight with Lemieux is HIS BEST performance ever. GGG already broke him down real badly, and made him look pathetic too. So all he did is prove that Lemieux is not really on top of the game compared with all three mentioned guys plus Jacobs.
Seeing him next vs. Jacobs, specially if the latter comes in with an abusive fight-night weight and in perfect condition to still fight well defensively, fast on both feet and hands, would be really intriguing, because it is a boxer that can defend well and can punch hard as well.
If Saunders did something similar to what he did to Lemieux against Sanders, then some people could dare say he has a big chance to defeat GGG or Canelo.
It would be awesome that the undercard for the GGG-Canelo rematch were Jacobs-BJS, wouldn't it? I'd bet it would probably get one of the top PPV figures of all time, why isn't ODLH thinking about arranging this?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostThats a bunch of bs about his supposed decline,hes the exact same fighter as hes ALWAYS been. Hes just started showing that he was never this monster gggroupies said he was & as soon as he finally stepped up it showed.(just as I said it would) Instead of other fighters finally growing balls its actually just him becoming willing to fight good opponents he avoided til age 34,he was unwilling to step up for fear of losing his canelo payday & was forced into fighting Jacobs whos the only good fighter besides canelo hes fought.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostYou ****** dsab canelo had 44 fights as an amatuer & lost 2 before age 15,& his resume since age 15 was VS GROWN PROFESSIONAL MEN IN 1 of the biggest fighting capitals Mexico.
You are truly the dumbest dsab on this entire site trying to claim ggg fighting amatuer bums for 3 rds is more than canelo having fought in pros since age 15,& he did not face bums u dīckless fąg,he has been taking on difficult fights since age 19.
ggg went pro at age 24,he didn't even win gold despite having many yrs longer than the kids he faced,ALL good boxers go pro unless they aren't good enough,only a true dīcksucking gggimp would say such ******ity as claiming a 15 yr old fighting grown pros in Mexico is easier than fighting worse than bums by definition that amateurs are in Kazakhstan of all places.
Only a true dumb **** would say "ggg fought more than 400 amatuer fights vs the worlds best" Ill let anyone who reads this dumb sh u write to piss themselves laughing YOU DON'T KNOW SH ABOUT BOXING
GGG at the world amateur level fought much better opposition than canelo did in his first 35 fights. Some fighters are Direll, korobov, bute. While canelo was beating cab drivers with losing records.
Haha Grown professional men in Mexico. How cute. I'm sitting here laughing at you. Hilarious. With losing records. Who are these killers from mexico that he was fighting at the age of 15?
Canelo only has 15 fights more as a pro, but has 350 plus less amateur fights. If you really believe canelo has more mileage on him than ggg then you are ******est poster on this forum bar none. Trying to tell me an 11 year amateur career dosen't take a toll on a fighter. Sit down little kid. You just got owned.Last edited by satiev1; 12-24-2017, 04:56 PM.
Comment
-
Sweet Pea Saunders is too much for Golovkin at this point
static, flat-footed, old..... cannot cut off the ring for shht
easy work, I would expect another boxing master-class
* waits for the..... " no power doe "..... people *
Comment
-
Originally posted by rrayvez View PostYeah, well at least saunders makes it obvious that he was waiting out ggg until he got old. There's video of him saying he wasn't ready. Now once there were back to back signs of decline with brook and more so jacobs, now everyone has new found balls.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j.razor View PostHow do you go from knocking out bums to stepping up in competition & struggling a decline? He is what he is....there never was a "decline."
Comment
Comment