Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Most entertaining & least entertaining (boring) champions of last 20 years?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Exciting- mayorga, manny, Tito

    Boring- Hopkins, m. Vasquez, Ruiz

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
      Hopkins did some embarrassing play acting though but yes Ward is a far dirtier fighter. Both were bad to watch but I consider Ward the ugliest elite level boxer I've ever seen.

      You are from Espana? What part? I love Spain. Been there many times.
      No just my ancestors I'm from California

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
        Who would you say are the 10 most entertaining championship level fighters of the last 20 years and the 10 most boring?

        Entertainers
        Felix Trinidad
        Juan Manuel Marquez
        Erik Morales
        Manny Pacquaio
        Marco Antonio Barrera
        Rafael Marquez
        Israel Vazquez
        Arturo Gatti
        Roman Gonzalez
        Diego Corrales

        Insomnia curers
        Andre Ward
        John Ruiz
        Sven Ottke
        Wladimir Klitshcko
        Floyd Mayweather
        Ricky Hatton
        Shawn Porter
        Winky Wright
        Bernard Hopkins
        Derrick Gainer

        I know some will attack me for including Ottke and I know he's unbeaten doe but his fights were boring and ugly. Hopkins I respect as an all-time great fighter but his fights were often ugly and marred by wrestling, holding, injury feigning etc; The rest need no explaining.
        Great list except for Wlad and Porter. Wlad scored some pretty bad ass KOs in his day and Porter is always fun to me. He's like a modern day Armstrong, always coming in and making a fight. I like that aggressive style.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
          Ok. In ring excitement and drama is created when two closely matched fighters fight. I would argue there are no fighters during his era that were his equal or really close which is why most of his fights weren't exciting.

          I think most fans appreciate greatness and domination like this and find it entertaining.

          Not taking chances-with all due respect I always see this as coded language for Floyd not giving his opponent a chance to get a KO win because he will not fight recklessly once he has a huge lead.

          respectfully, how can you not count those things? People pay to see fighters they are entertained by. They don't pay to see fighters they are bored by, right?

          You are entitled to your opinion. I just think "entertaining" should be measured by subjective factors, not objective ones.
          Fan boy alert

          Fan boy alert

          Fan boy alert

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by New England View Post
            john ruiz
            carlos molina
            miguel vazquez


            guess which category
            Titere Vazquez, the mexican Mayweather

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View Post
              Great list except for Wlad and Porter. Wlad scored some pretty bad ass KOs in his day and Porter is always fun to me. He's like a modern day Armstrong, always coming in and making a fight. I like that aggressive style.
              Where is Rigo?, and do not ask me on which class

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by FranciscoS View Post
                Where is Rigo?, and do not ask me on which class
                Which class?

                Comment


                  #48
                  Hatton in the boring list? Even from an objective perspective, he brought entertainment in every category, from an all action style to his persona and ability to build a fight. The former, in ring style, is the most important category of course and by some distance. Even if one does not like it, it can not objectively be labelled as boring, which would be along the lines of Wlad or Mayweather.

                  My top 5 in each category:

                  Most entertaining - Naz, Pacman, Oscar, MAB and Morales

                  Most boring - Mayweather, Wlad, Hopkins, Ward and Rigo

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
                    Wtf??? That guy needs to watch the Tszyu fight!!
                    And a lot of others imo.I would only put Ruiz prob on there.And even though I respect Porter I'm not crazy about watching him.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
                      Hatton in the boring list? Even from an objective perspective, he brought entertainment in every category, from an all action style to his persona and ability to build a fight. The former, in ring style, is the most important category of course and by some distance. Even if one does not like it, it can not objectively be labelled as boring, which would be along the lines of Wlad or Mayweather.

                      My top 5 in each category:

                      Most entertaining - Naz, Pacman, Oscar, MAB and Morales

                      Most boring - Mayweather, Wlad, Hopkins, Ward and Rigo
                      I know I'm prob in minority but I like watching good tech fighters like May,Ward,Rigo,Hopkins

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP