Most entertaining & least entertaining (boring) champions of last 20 years?

[chrisJS]

I know I'm prob in minority but I like watching good tech fighters like May,Ward,Rigo,Hopkins

Marquez, Morales, Barrera are all technical fighters. Ward isn't that technical. He clinches way too much and is more of a talented spoiler than a technical boxer.

Rigo is technical as hell though I'll say that but doesn't throw enough combinations to really entertain me. That's a personal taste thing though.

[chrisJS]

Also, Mark "Too Sharp" Johnson was a highly technical but very entertaining fighter. You can box and **** at the same time and be entertaining and skillful.

[john l]

Marquez, Morales, Barrera are all technical fighters. Ward isn't that technical. He clinches way too much and is more of a talented spoiler than a technical boxer.

Rigo is technical as hell though I'll say that but doesn't throw enough combinations to really entertain me. That's a personal taste thing though.

Ward is very tech good but don't have the athletism that other fighters like ssl,May but to say he is not a good tech I just don't see it.But whatever everyone has their opinion.

[chrisJS]

Ward is very tech good but don't have the athletism that other fighters like ssl,May but to say he is not a good tech I just don't see.But whatever everyone has their opinion.

He has or had excellent athleticism and skills but his fights would always turn into ugly foul filled clinch fests. Clinching was a constant throughout the whole fight and throw in headbutts, elbows, low blows etc; and they became horror shows.

[Larry the boss]

what I don't understand is how you have been here since 2007 and never made a thread until 2017.....

[john l]

He has or had excellent athleticism and skills but his fights would always turn into ugly foul filled clinch fests. Clinching was a constant throughout the whole fight and throw in headbutts, elbows, low blows etc; and they became horror shows.

Don't agree at all.He was also a good inside fighter(because his lack of athleticism and top level speed).But I can see we are very far apart on this so lets just agree to disagree and maybe find common ground on other subject.

[john l]

Also, Mark "Too Sharp" Johnson was a highly technical but very entertaining fighter. You can box and **** at the same time and be entertaining and skillful.

there we found one! I also think Too Sharp was very good tech and like a lot of other tech fighters I found him exciting.

[chrisJS]

what I don't understand is how you have been here since 2007 and never made a thread until 2017.....

What I don't understand is you said Mosley is a great win for Mayweather but Barrera wasn't for Marquez because you said 5 and a half years is a longer time than 7 years and never answered the questions following that and that a 38 year old 16 months inactive Mosley is a better fighter than a prime Pacquaio.

[Larry the boss]

What I don't understand is you said Mosley is a great win for Mayweather but Barrera wasn't for Marquez because you said 5 and a half years is a longer time than 7 years and never answered the questions following that and that a 38 year old 16 months inactive Mosley is a better fighter than a prime Pacquaio.

Mosley was p4p #3 WBA champ and lineal ww champ...What was Barrera p4p then?

[D4thincarnation]

Most Entertaining

Manny Pacquiao
Naseem Hamed
Roy Jones

Least Entertaining (Boring)

Mayweather
Andre Ward
Wladimir Klitshcko