Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Jacobs: Golovkin Opponents B-Class; I'm A Lot Different Than That
Collapse
-
This post alone catapulted you leaps and bounds ahead of the bootleg boxing fans in my signature. One thing to remember, these causals have a rebuttal for everything even when they get slapped ****** with facts or a slight understanding of boxing.Originally posted by angkag View PostSince Pirog, Jacob's last 12 opponents had a win ratio of 78% (ie won 78% of their previous fights). Golovkin's last 12 opponents have had a win ratio of 90%.
So if Golovkin's opponents have been B, Jacob's opponents have been.........
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by latinlingo View PostShadow Shadow Shadow, tell me you're not going back 14 fights and 5 years back? I want to cut you a break Shadow but you went full ****** on that one. Read my post, understand what I wrote before responding. I didn't mention him getting KTFO by Pirog 6 years ago. Why? Because it was 6 years ago menso! Pay attention one last time, Daniel Jacobs fought Sergio Mora twice, once which he got put on his as, got 1 minute of experience against Quillin then fought Caleb Truax, Jarrod Fletcher, Minton Nuñez, Giovanni Lorenzo, Keenan Collins, and more cab drivers since he lost to Pirog. Given that kind of opposition you and nobody else can say Jacobs has prepared well against GGG. What I said is Lemieux better prepared himself than Jacobs has. But to reach 14 fights back and 5 years ago to attempt to make a half as response is everything I would expect from a f******** casual. That's why you remain on my list of bootleg boxing fans bro, you're lost and that's putting it lightly...
Comment
-
Originally posted by RapidSon View PostWe finally get to see how GGG deals with a big middleweight with probably as much talent as he does. Jacobs just neds to put on so more weight so if GGG goes in bully mode he won't be throwing him around the ring like a lil b****
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gillie View PostU do realize that initial odds had GGG as an 8 to 1 favorite right?
Basically I would have to bet $1800 on GGG to win $100 and $800 to win $100 against GGG and the EXPERTS make up betting lines. But sone RTard thinks for some reason Lemuix smokes Jacobs??? Dude is high on some good FKN drugs and is hanging out with PEDketkin....Last edited by Shadoww702; 12-24-2016, 01:08 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by megas30 View PostYou realized Kell is black, right? He said Kell is an A-level fighter, but the weight disparity going into the fight gave him B-level status on which he's not wrong. People were counting out Brook because of the weight jump, and rightfully so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by latinlingo View PostThis post alone catapulted you leaps and bounds ahead of the bootleg boxing fans in my signature. One thing to remember, these causals have a rebuttal for everything even when they get slapped ****** with facts or a slight understanding of boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JRS1980 View PostI'm not sure what you are trying to imply here. You are aware that Golovkin is considered to be a small middleweight, yes? He typically weighs in at 158-59 and walks into the ring somewhere in the vicinity of 168-72. His walking around weight is about the same. Just about all of his opposition, including Kell Brook, have outweighed him on fight night. He is not one of these guys that cuts tons of weight and blows up, like Canelo or Charlo. He is a small middleweight. Furthermore, he doesn't throw guys around the ring. He is not someone who holds wrestles and clinches. He can bully someone because he has terrific footwork and knows how to properly cut off the ring. He is always in place and on balance, ready to punch. That has nothing to do with size. It has everything to do with skill.
Brook was undersized, Triple G even said so himself after he beat him, "he's not a middleweight."
Comment
Comment