Originally posted by WesternChamp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FOUR YEARS AGO: PAC vs JMM IV took place. KTFO!!COLD
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by fcastro1 View PostLol ok then. Guess we know where you stand then. Show me the article about PAC denying testing vs Marquez. The only one against extra testing was Marquez.
Don't let you're hatred for PAC degrade your morals as a human being. Don't defend a blatant cheat because of your hatred.
I don't know if JMM juiced. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence, no doubt despite the fact he tested negative.
Now, why did Manny say no to VADA?? Do you have the guts to answer that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostYou're doing it again. Whenever you are asked about Manny's decision for the fight you try and deflect and dodge or lie like you did here because you know in your heart there was no reason for him to say no to VADA testing.
I don't know if JMM juiced. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence, no doubt despite the fact he tested negative.
Now, why did Manny say no to VADA?? Do you have the guts to answer that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI am not su****ious of Manny. Did you see my post earlier where I clearly state this?Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI am not comparing anything. My point is simple. JMM asked for testing, Manny said no. Can you tell me why he said no to VADA?
Had Manny said yes to VADA, maybe JMM tests positive and your claims are proven. However, maybe Manny also tests positive.
I am not saying Manny is su****ious. I am asking why he said no to testing which made him look like he was hiding something?
Regardless of that, had Manny not dropped his hands when he was pressing for the KO, he wouldn't of gotten hit with a punch he didn't see and doesn't get KTFO.
your next post, you said why did he said no to testing, which made him look like he was hiding something.
yet for marquez, you're not questioning any of this from him because according to you, "he has never fail a test before' which is good enough, but manny has never fail a test either but this is not good enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postyou said had manny agreed to vada then maybe it could have tested positive (assuming he was dirty that's why he said no).
your next post, you said why did he said no to testing, which made him look like he was hiding something.
yet for marquez, you're not questioning any of this from him because according to you, "he has never fail a test before' which is good enough, but manny has never fail a test either but this is not good enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI am not su****ious of Manny. Did you see my post earlier where I clearly state this?
but marquez also said no to vada for bradley, but there's no supicious here since he never fail a test.
you see where this is going?
i dont care if you think pac is dirty, but dont act like marquez is clean even though marquez did the same thing pac did. if you're gonna call out one fighter then call the other guy out too for doing the exact same thing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postyou said had manny agreed to vada then maybe he could have tested positive (your assuming he was dirty that's why he said no).
your next post, you said why did he said no to testing, which made him look like he was hiding something.
yet for marquez, you're not questioning any of this from him because according to you, "he has never fail a test before' which is good enough, but manny has never fail a test either but this is not good enough.
I said he passed all the tests before and after this fight and he might not have had VADA testing been in place. I also pointed out Manny passed every test as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postmanny said no to vada for the marquez fight. maybe he was hiding something, maybe not.
but marquez also said no to vada for bradley, but there's no supicious here since he never fail a test.
you see where this is going?
i dont care if you think pac is dirty, but dont act like marquez is clean even though marquez did the same thing pac did. if you're gonna call out one fighter then call the other guy out too for doing the exact same thing.
I am not going to discuss a fight 11 months later as it has no bearing on this fight.
I am trying to get fcastro1 to give a reason why Manny said no to VADa. Maybe you can tell me. Whether you think JMM is dirty or not, this was a very weird decision to make.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostJMM didn't. He said he would if Manny did. Manny said no. You know this and are playing ****** because, as I posted before, you know there is no valid excuse for this decision by Manny,
We can go back and forth with this because what I understand is that Marquez team are the ones that denied testing
//*************/watch?v=eVRoDElVhds
What can't be denied is memos involvement with peds and Marquez fishy characteristics.
Comment
Comment