Comments Thread For: Povetkin's Promoter: We Won't Cancel, Stiverne Fight Still On

[M Bison]

So Stivernne found with tiny amount of ingredient in many over the counter diet and energy aids. Povetkin was found with small amount of substance in no over the counter aid a substance many Russian athletes cheat with recently Russian tennis player caught banned for 13 months. If Bermaine had that they wouldn't have fought all Russian athletes ordered to dope sad

Now this time, say that in English.

[M Bison]

Warrior? he would look like a hypocrite if he canceled, he isn't doing it because he is a warrior

WBC handed Deontay a free pass to duck him all because a banned substance in 2016, January was detected in micro traces in Povetkin body which is a normal thing but Deontay took that chance to duck him...

Stiverne made a mistake and handed Povetkin a chance to duck him, Povetkin choose not to duck him he ignores the call.

One was clearly off the banned substance and the other has been taking them recently within the coming months to this fight, so how are these two comparable and how does it make him a hypocrite If he choose not to fight him lol.

[Kigali]

Povetkin is a real man

& another dorky "recently banned over the counter supplement" bust while guys who are clearly on anabolic steroids pass test after test

The only stuff they ever catch with these tests is stuff nobody bothered to learn how to mask.

Says the brown-skinned White supremacist.

[Kigali]

Povetkin is a true ring warrior, unlike the cowardly Deontay Wilder.

Povetkin is a drug-cheating coward...like all the rest of them.

[Rip Chudd]

WBC handed Deontay a free pass to duck him all because a banned substance in 2016, January was detected in micro traces in Povetkin body which is a normal thing but Deontay took that chance to duck him...

Stiverne made a mistake and handed Povetkin a chance to duck him, Povetkin choose not to duck him he ignores the call.

One was clearly off the banned substance and the other has been taking them recently within the coming months to this fight, so how are these two comparable and how does it make him a hypocrite If he choose not to fight him lol.

It would make him a hypocrite cause his team criticized Wilder for not going through with the fight. Now if Povetkin turned around and called the fight off after criticizing then he would be doing what they clowned Wilder for doing. Povetkin came up clean in all his tests up until that one before the fight, how would that not look shady to the other team? Also the fight with Stiverne is over a month away, the failed test didn't come up for Povetkin til the week of the fight. I mean I know you're bias, but please play that garbage elsewhere.

[M Bison]

It would make him a hypocrite cause his team criticized Wilder for not going through with the fight. Now if Povetkin turned around and called the fight off after criticizing then he would be doing what they clowned Wilder for doing. Povetkin came up clean in all his tests up until that one before the fight, how would that not look shady to the other team? Also the fight with Stiverne is over a month away, the failed test didn't come up for Povetkin til the week of the fight. I mean I know you're bias, but please play that garbage elsewhere.

Drug got banned January 2016
He tested positive for small 'residual' traces of it in April thus meaning the last time he took it was the time when it was still allowed
He tested clean in his May test which proves you wrong If he took it from January to April he would have still had tested positive for it.

Fact remains Povetkin is willing to fight someone who has been using illegal substances months leading up to their fight whilst Wilder ducked the fight with Povetkin when he had been clean from January onwards.
As I said situations are not comparable now you've been schooled on it.

Also a little pointer for you residual means going away and drugs can be traceable in your body for months just incase you didn't catch onto what I'm meaning.

[Rip Chudd]

Drug got banned January 2016
He tested positive for small 'residual' traces of it in April thus meaning the last time he took it was the time when it was still allowed
He tested clean in his May test which proves you wrong If he took it from January to April he would have still had tested positive for it.

Fact remains Povetkin is willing to fight someone who has been using illegal substances months leading up to their fight whilst Wilder ducked the fight with Povetkin when he had been clean from January onwards.
As I said situations are not comparable now you've been schooled on it.

Also a little pointer for you residual means going away and drugs can be traceable in your body for months just incase you didn't catch onto what I'm meaning.

I honestly couldn't care less about the garbage you are talking about. You went on this dumb tirade as if I said he didn't have trace amounts. Answer me this, when Wilder was informed that Povetkin failed a test did they tell him "Povetkin failed a drug test" or did they go out of their way to say "He failed a test, but it's only a tiny amount which shows that he hasn't been taking it recently but only before it was banned, so the fight can still happen".

NO, when a fighter is informed the other has failed a test, that's all that is told is that he failed a test. The investigation hadn't been done, all Wilder knew was that the guy who had been testing clean up until the week of the fight all of a sudden failed a drug test.

Him testing in May doesn't prove me wrong at all as my stance from my first post was that he tested positive after having passed the previous tests. Seems you need some reading comprehension lessons man. You typed all that bullcrap for nothing.

[Fetta]

Well it has to go on or they'll look like hypocrites

[The Big Dunn]

I honestly couldn't care less about the garbage you are talking about. You went on this dumb tirade as if I said he didn't have trace amounts. Answer me this, when Wilder was informed that Povetkin failed a test did they tell him "Povetkin failed a drug test" or did they go out of their way to say "He failed a test, but it's only a tiny amount which shows that he hasn't been taking it recently but only before it was banned, so the fight can still happen".

NO, when a fighter is informed the other has failed a test, that's all that is told is that he failed a test. The investigation hadn't been done, all Wilder knew was that the guy who had been testing clean up until the week of the fight all of a sudden failed a drug test.

Him testing in May doesn't prove me wrong at all as my stance from my first post was that he tested positive after having passed the previous tests. Seems you need some reading comprehension lessons man. You typed all that bullcrap for nothing.

Red Cyclone could care less if Povetkin used PED's prior to a Wilder fight since he desperately wants POvetkin to win.

If you reverse wilder and povetkin, he'd be posting WIlder was a cheater etc, same as his tirades about IV's and TUE's

[bigjavi973]

Gotta admit, that's a pretty solid dig at Wilder. Pretty obvious what they're saying here.

well of course... they probably found some other "legal" means to cheat...

"as long as it isnt banned!!!!"