Originally posted by PivotandRoll
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Crawford #3 P4P by TBRB
Collapse
-
Originally posted by kiaba360 View PostPeople are always busy arguing about order/placement, but look at the list from a political standpoint: 7 of the 10 boxers on TBRB's list fight on HBO, and the list has no PBC fighters. The Ring's list is the same way, but they have Loma instead of Bradley.
Wilder has fought 1 top10 contender
Thurman has less P4P claim than Brook.
Lara has looked vulnerable too much and lacks notable wins
Mikey Garcia has been inactive
Danny Garcia has a decent claim but has got some gift decisions. He still appears on some P4P lists.
Out of all the PBC guys, I think the winner of Frampton/LSC deserves a spot on a P4P list... nobody else does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostBurns, Beltran, Gamboa, Dulorme, Jean and now Postol.
That's a great deal better than anything GGG has done.
Beltran BUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Gamboa 126lber lol
Dulorme, who!?!?!?
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahgahahahahahaha
Next joke you troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cork View PostNot gonna argue who deserves to be higher but how is ggg reliant on power? Just because he have power doesn't mean he's reliant on it. Ggg barely lose rounds in fact you can probably count on two hands how many rounds ggg lost in his pro career and most of the rounds he loses because he wants to make it a fight for the fan instead of just doing what he normally does. You don't win in the amateur because of power.
It was probably harsh to say he would be handicapped without his power cause that implies he's a caveman of sorts, which I know he's not otherwise he wouldn't be such a decorated amateur but people still get hurt and knocked out in the amateurs.
We can agree to disagree, cause the stats of how few rounds GGG loses don't lie but his boxing ability isn't the only factor and in my opinion it is not the main factor.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostI mean he's the best fighter. I don't see anyone I think is better right now.
Not even near the single best win in the sport at the moment....Postol was NEVER even spoken as a top 20 P4P fighter...
Thurman>Porter is a much better win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostNot sure what your point is. PBC doesn't have any fighters that belong on a P4P list.
Wilder has fought 1 top10 contender
Thurman has less P4P claim than Brook.
Lara has looked vulnerable too much and lacks notable wins
Mikey Garcia has been inactive
Danny Garcia has a decent claim but has got some gift decisions. He still appears on some P4P lists.
Out of all the PBC guys, I think the winner of Frampton/LSC deserves a spot on a P4P list... nobody else does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by b0xLet's see thurman move up a division and thoroughly shut out the top boxer, who has a great height and reach advantage (erislandy lara for example)...
Thurman vs Porter was close. Crawford vs Postol was not. Thurman didn't move up a division. Crawford did. Postol + Crawford were top ranked at 140, Porter and Thurman not quite at 147.
I thought we didn't give credit to people draining themselves to win titles?? Or did Crawfrod not beat Prescott at 140 before dropping back down to win his titles???
And once again, who thought Postol was better than Broner at 140?
Did you just compare Postol to fu(king Lara??? OH you shameless fu(ks...
Comment
-
Comment