Crawford #3 P4P by TBRB

[PivotandRoll]

LOL. Just spotted this gem. Conversation over.








Oh yeah, and since you said you've followed crawford since prescott, you should have known that beltran and crawford was ring ****zine ranked 1 vs 2.




So if we count that, he's beaten the ring best lightweight and the ring best super-lightweight of the time. Broner hasn't beaten the ring best anybody LOL.

Paulie wasn't ranked number 1 or 2 anywhere when he fought broner LOL. But Broner was number 5 ring ****zine p4p!!(Ironically the same place they have Crawford now...) LOL.

Don't worry about thanking me, I know pride/ignorance is a killer. I'll see ya around.






Oh yeah, one last thing:



I am compared to you!

Wow, did the official score cards not reflect the true outcome of the fight?

Broner won almost all the rounds against Paulie, but Paulie was doing much better than expected thus rounds were scored for him. I know the fights I saw, and they were just as close.

Also I didn't say Broner is better than Crawford you tool, I said he and not Postol should have been number two at 140.

Try learning to read.

[PivotandRoll]

No, we're going to ignore everything you say until you acknowledge that you didn't read my first post properly. Otherwise you are trying to build a house on a broken brick.

Now asking more silly questions like "What does anything you just said have to do with Postol being better than Broner?". Where on earth did you pull that random ass question out of space from? Who on earth on this planet right here you martian, said that postol was better than Broner, in our convo???. Please read, READ the actual posts!! I can't do everything for you, you absolute sausage.

I get what you're doing. You're acting (probably not acting!) such a dope, and going so far off from the original point that you think it will save you. I'll do the same thing then.
What does anything that you posted have to do with oranges in early spring??



Oh, and btw, Crawford would annihilate broner. So don't keep talking about broner when we're talking about good fighters who came from one weight beating the best fighter at another weight. Broner has never done that in his life, EVER.

My original post was replying to someone saying that Crawford is the best boxer on the planet. I disagreed and said it's nowhere near the single best win. You threw a tantrum saying Thurman didn't go up in weight to beat Porter despite the fact that Bud had already fought at 140. You should work on your memory.

You said he moved up and beat the best fighter in the division, And I think Broner is better than Postol and would take the fight at 140. I mean if both are in the Manny sweepstakes then they should be there for each other.

We'll just have to wait and see if Crawford would "annihilate" Broner. Lets see him fight Maidana or Porter.

[Godsfly]

people are mainly fighting because of golovkin. thats what I'm reading in this thread....golovkin should be ranked higher then crawford.


let this sink in your head......golovkin is fighting a decent.....WELTERWEIGHT. many claim that brook is the greatest of the welterweights but i disagree. he hasn't proven it. beating porter in a close fight (where he grabbed and held on for life) doesn't prove that. thurman got the same win without the clinch fest. also u have guys like spence, bradley, garcia, vargas wanting to fight brook. brook hasn't proven anything. he hasn't even fought thurman? and u mean to tell me golovkin is fighting him all the way at middleweight? golovkin career is a circus show at this point. he hasn't done anything to bring him closer to legacy & he's 34. in fact brook may have the better resume & he's 4 years younger then golovkin. thats laughable.


why wouldn't i rate crawford over golovkin? if thurman has one more solid win against someone like a vargas i would rate him over golovkin too. so what.

[LacedUp]

So you just gonna nose dive into the hype? Fair enough....

Not even near the single best win in the sport at the moment....Postol was NEVER even spoken as a top 20 P4P fighter...

Thurman>Porter is a much better win.

Well first you ask me about skills then resume? I think he's the best fighter, regardless of resume. i also think GGG is one of the best, but I don't think he has the best resume.

I think Crawford's body of work is pretty good. He's beaten a host of world champions now. Postol was a really good, undefeated fighter coming off a win over Lucas Matthysse.

I don't care what anyone says, Matthysse was an animal, with skills and heart to match. Postol was a huge underdog and won.

Many people on NSB were picking Postol to beat Crawford. I always said I expected Crawford to beat Postol easily, but that's more of a testament to Crawford's skills rather than Postol's.

[cork]

Well first you ask me about skills then resume? I think he's the best fighter, regardless of resume. i also think GGG is one of the best, but I don't think he has the best resume.

I think Crawford's body of work is pretty good. He's beaten a host of world champions now. Postol was a really good, undefeated fighter coming off a win over Lucas Matthysse.

I don't care what anyone says, Matthysse was an animal, with skills and heart to match. Postol was a huge underdog and won.

Many people on NSB were picking Postol to beat Crawford. I always said I expected Crawford to beat Postol easily, but that's more of a testament to Crawford's skills rather than Postol's.

Not gonna defend or argue about p4p rankings but people dksab on this site. Crawford was a 7/1 favorite going into this fight on most book. That's a huge underdog. To put it into perspective canelo was only a 5/1 favorite to Khan and everyone knew Khan was going to get blasted.

[PivotandRoll]

Well first you ask me about skills then resume? I think he's the best fighter, regardless of resume. i also think GGG is one of the best, but I don't think he has the best resume.

I think Crawford's body of work is pretty good. He's beaten a host of world champions now. Postol was a really good, undefeated fighter coming off a win over Lucas Matthysse.

I don't care what anyone says, Matthysse was an animal, with skills and heart to match. Postol was a huge underdog and won.

Many people on NSB were picking Postol to beat Crawford. I always said I expected Crawford to beat Postol easily, but that's more of a testament to Crawford's skills rather than Postol's.

Lucas was hype...Has always been. He didn't stop Judah, got easily outboxed by Garcia and had to walk through fire against Ruslan and Molina ....That should tell you everything you need to know about how much of an animal he is..... He was never the next Manny Pacquiao and only idiots thought he was.

Postol is a good fighter. That's it. How could you have Bud over Fury? How does Bud's win over Postol get him rated higher than Manny's win over Bradley? This is Manny's 3rd win in his 8th division against the top guy.

Crawford is getting the hype just like everyone else...And it's kinda sad to see you just accept it blindly.